Mode of Reproduction: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<blockquote class=" | {{navmenu}} | ||
The '''Mode of Reproduction''' | <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | ||
<blockquote class="definition"> | |||
The '''Mode of Reproduction''' refers to the institutional, cultural, and ideological systems that ensure the continuation and stability of a given [[Regime of Accumulation]] by reproducing its class structures, belief systems, and behavioral norms across generations.<ref>Althusser, Louis. ''“Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.”'' In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays'', translated by Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971.</ref> This includes the symbolic and ideological apparatuses—such as religion, schooling, media, family, and morality—that cultivate individuals who accept and internalize the logic of the system. These institutions naturalize hierarchy, justify accumulation, and reproduce compliant identities. In this way, the Mode of Reproduction facilitates and stabilizes the long-term operation of the [[Mode of Accumulation]]. | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==Regime of Accumulation== | ==Concept Map== | ||
===Regime of Accumulation=== | |||
[[Components of the Regime]] > {{#ask:[[Is a component of::The System]]}} | [[Components of the Regime]] > {{#ask:[[Is a component of::The System]]}} | ||
[[ | [[Mode of Reproduction]] > {{#ask:[[Is a relation of::The System]]}} | ||
===Mechanisms of Reproduction=== | |||
[[Mode of Reproduction]] > {{#ask:[[Is a::Mode of Reproduction]]}} | |||
==Syncretic Terms== | ===Syncretic Terms=== | ||
[[ | [[Mode of Reproduction]] > {{#ask:[[Is a syncretic term::Mode of Reproduction]]}} | ||
==Related LP Terms== | ===Related LP Terms=== | ||
[[Mode of Reproduction]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related LP term::Mode of Reproduction]]}} | [[Mode of Reproduction]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related LP term::Mode of Reproduction]]}} | ||
==Non-LP Related Terms== | ===Non-LP Related Terms=== | ||
[[Mode of Reproduction]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related term::Mode of Reproduction]]}} | [[Mode of Reproduction]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related term::Mode of Reproduction]]}} | ||
==Why This Matters== | |||
The '''Mode of Reproduction''' reveals how oppressive systems sustain themselves not only through force or economic domination, but through '''ideological engineering''', '''social conditioning''', and the manipulation of cultural narratives. It explains why disconnection, spiritual suppression, and toxic normativity persist even without overt violence. Without changing the Mode of Reproduction, no transformation of society is durable. | |||
==Strategic Significance== | |||
In the Avatar.Global framework, the transition to a post-capitalist, Stage Seven civilization requires dismantling and rebuilding the Mode of Reproduction to support healing, [[Connection]], and [[Human Development]]. This means replacing institutions of domination (e.g., capitalist schooling, elite religion, corporate media) with ones rooted in [[Authentic Spirituality]], [[HEALING Pedagogy]], and conscious co-development. | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
The Mode of Reproduction includes: | |||
* '''Education Systems''' – Transmit ideology, suppress critical thinking, normalize class hierarchy. | |||
* '''Religious Institutions''' – Propagate elite mythology, moralize poverty and obedience (see [[Authoritarian Monotheism]], [[Elite Religion]]). | |||
* '''Media''' – Shape norms, aspirations, and consent; obscure structural violence (see [[Symbol Factories]]). | |||
* '''Family Structures''' – Reproduce gender roles, obedience, and identity under capitalism. | |||
* '''Cultural Narratives''' – Embed stories of merit, sin, success, and suffering to justify inequality. | |||
Reproductive failure occurs when younger generations reject dominant ideology—often a sign of systemic crisis and possibility for revolutionary transformation. | |||
Closely associated with terms like [[Toxic Socialization]], [[Old Energy Creation Template]], [[Disconnection]], and [[System Maintenance]]. | |||
==Quotes== | |||
===Reproduction of the Means of Production=== | ===Reproduction of the Means of Production=== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 65: | ||
# " by giving labour power the material means with which to reproduce itself: by wages. "<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref> | # " by giving labour power the material means with which to reproduce itself: by wages. "<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref> | ||
# by ensuring the reproduction of the skills needed function within the productive forces. | # by ensuring the reproduction of the skills needed function within the productive forces. | ||
# providing the continued reproduction of the workplace (i.e., turning out sufficient new babies to man positions within [[The Regime]] (see [[Binary Gender]]) | |||
# by learning "the ‘rules’ of good behaviour, i.e. the attitude that should be observed by every agent in the division of labour, according to the job he is ‘destined’ for: rules of morality, civic and professional conscience, which actually means rules of respect for the socio-technical division of labour and ultimately the rules of the order established by class domination. They also learn to ‘speak proper French’, to ‘handle’ the workers correctly, i.e. actually (for the future capitalists and their servants) to ‘order them about’ properly, i.e. (ideally) to ‘speak to them’ in the right way, etc."<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref> | # by learning "the ‘rules’ of good behaviour, i.e. the attitude that should be observed by every agent in the division of labour, according to the job he is ‘destined’ for: rules of morality, civic and professional conscience, which actually means rules of respect for the socio-technical division of labour and ultimately the rules of the order established by class domination. They also learn to ‘speak proper French’, to ‘handle’ the workers correctly, i.e. actually (for the future capitalists and their servants) to ‘order them about’ properly, i.e. (ideally) to ‘speak to them’ in the right way, etc."<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref> | ||
"The reproduction of labour power thus reveals as its sine qua non not only the reproduction of its ‘skills’ but also the reproduction of its subjection to the ruling ideology or of the ‘practice’ of that ideology, with the proviso that it is not enough to say ‘not only but also’, for it is clear that it is in the forms and under the forms of ideological subjection that provision is made for the reproduction of the skills of labour power."<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref> | |||
===Reproduction of the Relations of Production=== | ===Reproduction of the Relations of Production=== | ||
Far more interesting and problematic is the reproduction of the relations of production. This reproduction is ensured by | Far more interesting and problematic is the reproduction of the relations of production. This reproduction is ensured by the "legal-political and ideological superstructure."<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref> | ||
"...it is secured by the exercise of State power in the State Apparatuses, on the one hand the (Repressive) State Apparatus, on the other theIdeological State Apparatuses."<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref> | |||
<blockquote> | |||
What I have just said must also be taken into account, and it can be assembled in the form of the following three features: | |||
1. All the State Apparatuses function both by repression and by ideology, with the difference that the (Repressive) State Apparatus functions massively and predominantly by repression, whereas the Ideological State Apparatuses function massively and predominantly by ideology. | |||
2. Whereas the (Repressive) State Apparatus constitutes an organized whole whose different parts are centralized beneath a commanding unity, that of the politics of class struggle applied by the political representatives of the ruling classes in possession of State power, the Ideological State Apparatuses are multiple, distinct, ‘relatively autonomous’ and capable of providing an objective field to contradictions which express, in forms which may be limited or extreme, the effects of the clashes between the capitalist class struggle and the proletarian class struggle, as well as their subordinate forms. | |||
3. Whereas the unity of the (Repressive) State Apparatus is secured by its unified and centralized organization under the leadership of the representatives of the classes in power executing the politics of the class struggle of the classes in power,the unity of the different Ideological State Apparatuses is secured, usually in contradictory forms, by the ruling ideology, the ideology of the ruling class | |||
</blockquote> | |||
==Quotes== | ==Quotes== | ||
"It follows that, in order to exist, every social formation must reproduce the conditions of its production at the same time as it produces, and in order to be able to produce.<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref>" | "It follows that, in order to exist, every social formation must reproduce the conditions of its production at the same time as it produces, and in order to be able to produce.<ref>Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.'' Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.</ref>" | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 62: | Line 99: | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 18 April 2025
Mode of Reproduction
The Mode of Reproduction refers to the institutional, cultural, and ideological systems that ensure the continuation and stability of a given Regime of Accumulation by reproducing its class structures, belief systems, and behavioral norms across generations.[1] This includes the symbolic and ideological apparatuses—such as religion, schooling, media, family, and morality—that cultivate individuals who accept and internalize the logic of the system. These institutions naturalize hierarchy, justify accumulation, and reproduce compliant identities. In this way, the Mode of Reproduction facilitates and stabilizes the long-term operation of the Mode of Accumulation.
Concept Map
Regime of Accumulation
Components of the Regime > Mode of Accumulation, Mode of Production, Mode of Reproduction
Mode of Reproduction > Relations of Accumulation
Mechanisms of Reproduction
Syncretic Terms
Related LP Terms
Non-LP Related Terms
Why This Matters
The Mode of Reproduction reveals how oppressive systems sustain themselves not only through force or economic domination, but through ideological engineering, social conditioning, and the manipulation of cultural narratives. It explains why disconnection, spiritual suppression, and toxic normativity persist even without overt violence. Without changing the Mode of Reproduction, no transformation of society is durable.
Strategic Significance
In the Avatar.Global framework, the transition to a post-capitalist, Stage Seven civilization requires dismantling and rebuilding the Mode of Reproduction to support healing, Connection, and Human Development. This means replacing institutions of domination (e.g., capitalist schooling, elite religion, corporate media) with ones rooted in Authentic Spirituality, HEALING Pedagogy, and conscious co-development.
Notes
The Mode of Reproduction includes:
- Education Systems – Transmit ideology, suppress critical thinking, normalize class hierarchy.
- Religious Institutions – Propagate elite mythology, moralize poverty and obedience (see Authoritarian Monotheism, Elite Religion).
- Media – Shape norms, aspirations, and consent; obscure structural violence (see Symbol Factories).
- Family Structures – Reproduce gender roles, obedience, and identity under capitalism.
- Cultural Narratives – Embed stories of merit, sin, success, and suffering to justify inequality.
Reproductive failure occurs when younger generations reject dominant ideology—often a sign of systemic crisis and possibility for revolutionary transformation.
Closely associated with terms like Toxic Socialization, Old Energy Creation Template, Disconnection, and System Maintenance.
Quotes
Reproduction of the Means of Production
The reproduction of the means of production is straightforward. Raw materials are continually extracted, machinery is maintained and where necessary replaced, finances or organized to ensure the ongoing ability to finance the reproduction.
"As Marx said, every child knows that a social formation which did not reproduce the conditions of production at the same time as it produced would not last a year.[2] The ultimate condition of production is therefore the reproduction of the conditions of production. This may be ‘simple’ (reproducing exactly the previous conditions of production) or ‘on an extended scale’ (expanding them). Let us ignore this last distinction for the moment."[2]
Reproduction of Labour-Power
How is the reproduction of labour power ensured?
- " by giving labour power the material means with which to reproduce itself: by wages. "[3]
- by ensuring the reproduction of the skills needed function within the productive forces.
- providing the continued reproduction of the workplace (i.e., turning out sufficient new babies to man positions within The Regime (see Binary Gender)
- by learning "the ‘rules’ of good behaviour, i.e. the attitude that should be observed by every agent in the division of labour, according to the job he is ‘destined’ for: rules of morality, civic and professional conscience, which actually means rules of respect for the socio-technical division of labour and ultimately the rules of the order established by class domination. They also learn to ‘speak proper French’, to ‘handle’ the workers correctly, i.e. actually (for the future capitalists and their servants) to ‘order them about’ properly, i.e. (ideally) to ‘speak to them’ in the right way, etc."[4]
"The reproduction of labour power thus reveals as its sine qua non not only the reproduction of its ‘skills’ but also the reproduction of its subjection to the ruling ideology or of the ‘practice’ of that ideology, with the proviso that it is not enough to say ‘not only but also’, for it is clear that it is in the forms and under the forms of ideological subjection that provision is made for the reproduction of the skills of labour power."[5]
Reproduction of the Relations of Production
Far more interesting and problematic is the reproduction of the relations of production. This reproduction is ensured by the "legal-political and ideological superstructure."[6]
"...it is secured by the exercise of State power in the State Apparatuses, on the one hand the (Repressive) State Apparatus, on the other theIdeological State Apparatuses."[7]
What I have just said must also be taken into account, and it can be assembled in the form of the following three features:
1. All the State Apparatuses function both by repression and by ideology, with the difference that the (Repressive) State Apparatus functions massively and predominantly by repression, whereas the Ideological State Apparatuses function massively and predominantly by ideology.
2. Whereas the (Repressive) State Apparatus constitutes an organized whole whose different parts are centralized beneath a commanding unity, that of the politics of class struggle applied by the political representatives of the ruling classes in possession of State power, the Ideological State Apparatuses are multiple, distinct, ‘relatively autonomous’ and capable of providing an objective field to contradictions which express, in forms which may be limited or extreme, the effects of the clashes between the capitalist class struggle and the proletarian class struggle, as well as their subordinate forms.
3. Whereas the unity of the (Repressive) State Apparatus is secured by its unified and centralized organization under the leadership of the representatives of the classes in power executing the politics of the class struggle of the classes in power,the unity of the different Ideological State Apparatuses is secured, usually in contradictory forms, by the ruling ideology, the ideology of the ruling class
Quotes
"It follows that, in order to exist, every social formation must reproduce the conditions of its production at the same time as it produces, and in order to be able to produce.[8]"
To put this more scientifically, I shall say that the reproduction of labour power requires not only a reproduction of its skills, but also, at the same time, a reproduction of its submission to the rules of the established order, i.e. a reproduction of submission to the ruling ideology for the workers, and a reproduction of the ability to manipulate the ruling ideology correctly for the agents of exploitation and repression, so that they, too, will provide for the domination of the ruling class ‘in words’.
In other words, the school (but also other State institutions like the Church, or other apparatuses like the Army) teaches ‘know-how’, but in forms which ensure subjection to the ruling ideology or the mastery of its ‘practice’. All the agents of production, exploitation and repression, not to speak of the ‘professionals of ideology’ (Marx), must in one way or another be ‘steeped’ in this ideology in order to perform their tasks ‘conscientiously’ – the tasks of the exploited (the proletarians), of the exploiters (the capitalists), of the exploiters’ auxiliaries (the managers), or of the high priests of the ruling ideology (its ‘functionaries’), etc.
The reproduction of labour power thus reveals as its sine qua non not only the reproduction of its ‘skills’ but also the reproduction of its subjection to the ruling ideology or the mastery of its ‘practice.’ of that ideology, with the proviso that it is not enough to say ‘not only but also’, for it is clear that it is in the forms and under the forms of ideological subjection that provision is made for the reproduction of the skills of labour power.[9]
Citation and Legal
Treat the SpiritWiki as an open-access online monograph or structured textbook. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; however, attribution, citation, and/or direct linking are ethically required.
Footnotes
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
- ↑ Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, 1971. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.