Exploitative Techniques: Difference between revisions
From The SpiritWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{endstuff}} | {{endstuff}} | ||
[[category:terms]][[Is a related term::Mode of Exploitation| ]][[Is a related term::Mechanisms of Force| ]][[Is a related term::Ideological Institutions| ]][[Is a related term::Exploitative Techniques| ]] | [[category:terms]][[Is a related term::Mode of Exploitation| ]][[Is a related term::Mechanisms of Force| ]][[Is a related term::Ideological Institutions| ]][[Is a related term::Exploitative Techniques| ]][[Is a related term::Exploitation| ]] | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 9 October 2020
According to Ruyle,[1], exploitative techniques are the "precise instrumentalities through which economic surplus is pumped out of the direct producers: slavery, plunder, tribute, rent, taxation, usury, and various forms of unequal exchange." Exploitative techniques are one of three factors (the others being the Mechanisms of Force and Ideological Institutions0 which together constitute a particular Mode of Exploitation (a.k.a.The System).
Related Terms
Exploitation, Hidden Curriculum, Mechanisms of Force, Mechanisms of Indoctrination
Notes
According to Ruyle[2] any specific Mode of Exploitation consists of three interrelated factors; these factors include
- Exploitative Techniques (i.e. the mechanisms through which economic surplus is extracted,
- Mechanisms of Force (like the police and the army who are called in to ensure regimes of extraction continue by physically coercing the population if necessary), and
- Ideological Institutions (like the elementary education system, the Catholic Church, Hollywood, and the family, tasked with controlling the minds of the exploited populations.
Footnotes
- ↑ Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 12
- ↑ Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 11
