Discourse: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<blockquote class="definition">'''Discourse''' sets of rules and conditions which are established between institutions, economic and social practices, and patterns of behavior" <ref>McDonald, Matthew, and Jean O’Callaghan. “Positive Psychology: A Foucauldian Critique.” ''The Humanistic Psychologist,'' 36, no. 2 (April 2008): 127–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873260802111119.</ref> | <blockquote class="definition">'''Discourse''' sets of rules and conditions which are established between institutions, economic and social practices, and patterns of behavior" <ref>McDonald, Matthew, and Jean O’Callaghan. “Positive Psychology: A Foucauldian Critique.” ''The Humanistic Psychologist,'' 36, no. 2 (April 2008): 127–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873260802111119.</ref> The term is syncretic with the LP term [[Creation Template]]. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 20 October 2024
Discourse sets of rules and conditions which are established between institutions, economic and social practices, and patterns of behavior" [1] The term is syncretic with the LP term Creation Template.
Foucault
Foucault > Archaeological Research, Discourse, Subjugated Knowledge, Technologies of the Self
Syncretic Terms
Creation Template > Comprehensive Framework, Discourse, Existential Narrative, Existential Paradigm, Functional Narrative, Ideology, Master Narrative, Master Story, Meaning Structure
Related LP Terms
Non-LP Related Terms
Notes
"discourse’ would then be whatever constrains—but also enables—writing, speaking and thinking within such specific historical limits."[2]
"...discourses make possible certain realities, certain world views, and certain disciplines "makes possible the field of the human sciences—there are new objects which require new analyses—with distinct discourses covering each of the three areas: psychology (human life), sociology (human labour) and the studies of literature and myth (human signification, ‘man’ to ‘man’). Then, in the twentieth century, structuralism announces."[3]
"According to this position, what we can imagine (let alone put into practice) is both permitted and constrained by the discursive, that is representational, possibilities at our disposal.Thus both ‘the world’ and our consciousness of it are effects of the kinds of representations we can make of it. But, at the same time, discourse is not just a form of representation.""[4]. In other words, discourses provide "templates" that quite literally create the world around us. See Creation Templates
Footnotes
- ↑ McDonald, Matthew, and Jean O’Callaghan. “Positive Psychology: A Foucauldian Critique.” The Humanistic Psychologist, 36, no. 2 (April 2008): 127–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873260802111119.
- ↑ McHoul, Alec, and Wendy Grace. A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power and the Subject. New York: Routledge, 1993. p. 31.
- ↑ McHoul, Alec, and Wendy Grace. A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power and the Subject. New York: Routledge, 1993. p. 33.
- ↑ McHoul, Alec, and Wendy Grace. A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power and the Subject. New York: Routledge, 1993. p. 34.
