Eupsychian Biology: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
Created page with "{{navmenu}} <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> <blockquote class="definition">'''Eupsychian Biology''' is a normative biology devoted to the development of the Good Specimen, the specimen with that has realized and actuate their full potential.<ref><ref>Maslow, A. H. “Toward a Humanistic Biology.” ''American Psychologist'' 24, no. 8 (1969): 724–35. doi:10.1037/h0027859.</ref></ref></blockquote> == Concept Map == === Key Terms=== Eupsychia > {{..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navmenu}} | {{navmenu}} | ||
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | ||
<blockquote class="definition">'''Eupsychian Biology''' is a normative biology devoted to the development of the [[Good Specimen]], the specimen with that has realized and actuate their full potential. | <blockquote class="definition">'''Eupsychian Biology''' is a normative biology devoted to the development of the [[Good Specimen]], the specimen with that has realized and actuate their full potential.<ref>Maslow, A. H. “Toward a Humanistic Biology.” ''American Psychologist'' 24, no. 8 (1969): 724–35. doi:10.1037/h0027859.</ref></blockquote> | ||
== Concept Map == | == Concept Map == | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
=== Maslow's Elitism === | |||
Maslow had some elitist tendencies, seeming to come later in his career. He spoke of a "biologically... privileged class," a "biological elite" that he felt would be fully exposed in a Eupsychian society. He says he has "anticipated that when there is no longer social injustice to serve as an alibi or an excuse for one's own biological inadequacies, then there might well be a great increase in Nietzschean ''ressentiment'' or malicious envy of those who are more successful in their achievements." Therefore, he wonders, how to "protect the biologically gifted from the almost inevitable malice of the biologically nongifted." The only way he saw out of this was that the "any future one-world civilization" the "biological superiors (alphas or aggridants)" would need to become a "priestly class to which is given less monetary reward and fewer privileges or luxuries than the average members of the overall population."<blockquote>The picture I have here is of the leaders of civilization--the sages, teachers, pioneers, and creators--composing something like the Grey Eminence figures of the past, like monks clad in the simplest garments and perhaps vowing to lead selfless lives of poverty.<ref>Maslow, Abraham H. “Humanistic Biology: Elitist Implications of the Concept of ‘Full-Humanness.’” In ''Future Visions: The Unpublished Papers of Abraham Maslow'', edited by Edward Hoffman, 70–73. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996. p. 71.</ref></blockquote>His ideas is basically to "constitute a board or commission of sages to help humankind make its choices about how to evolve itself, toward which ideal type of human to move, and how to biologically select the good and wise?" He further notes that "this phrasing of the question may be less offensive or frightening than simply to state that some people are biologically superior to others.<ref>Maslow, Abraham H. “Humanistic Biology: Elitist Implications of the Concept of ‘Full-Humanness.’” In ''Future Visions: The Unpublished Papers of Abraham Maslow'', edited by Edward Hoffman, 70–73. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.p. 72</ref> | |||
==Quotes== | ==Quotes== | ||
| Line 18: | Line 21: | ||
<blockquote>But quite apart from this, my immediate proposal for biologists is that they recognize that once they have swallowed the normative approach to the human species, or any other species, that is, once they have accepted as their obligation the development of the good specimen, then it becomes equally their scientific obligation to study all those conditions that conduce to the development of the good specimen, and to those conditions that inhibit such development. Obviously, this means emergence from the laboratory and into society.<ref>Maslow, A. H. “Toward a Humanistic Biology.” ''American Psychologist'' 24, no. 8 (1969): 724–35. doi:10.1037/h0027859. </ref> | <blockquote>But quite apart from this, my immediate proposal for biologists is that they recognize that once they have swallowed the normative approach to the human species, or any other species, that is, once they have accepted as their obligation the development of the good specimen, then it becomes equally their scientific obligation to study all those conditions that conduce to the development of the good specimen, and to those conditions that inhibit such development. Obviously, this means emergence from the laboratory and into society.<ref>Maslow, A. H. “Toward a Humanistic Biology.” ''American Psychologist'' 24, no. 8 (1969): 724–35. doi:10.1037/h0027859. </ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
== Maslow Index == | == Maslow Index == | ||
Latest revision as of 20:36, 3 February 2026
Eupsychian Biology
Eupsychian Biology is a normative biology devoted to the development of the Good Specimen, the specimen with that has realized and actuate their full potential.[1]
Concept Map
Key Terms
- Abraham Maslow
- Eupsychia Key Figures
- Eupsychian Biology
- Eupsychian Education
- Eupsychian Management
- Eupsychian Psychology
- Eupsychian Science
- Eupsychian Society
- Eupsychian Theory
- Eupsychian Therapist
- Eupsychian Therapy
- Euspychian Methods
- Humanistic Psychology
- Transpersonal Psychology
Notes
Maslow's Elitism
Maslow had some elitist tendencies, seeming to come later in his career. He spoke of a "biologically... privileged class," a "biological elite" that he felt would be fully exposed in a Eupsychian society. He says he has "anticipated that when there is no longer social injustice to serve as an alibi or an excuse for one's own biological inadequacies, then there might well be a great increase in Nietzschean ressentiment or malicious envy of those who are more successful in their achievements." Therefore, he wonders, how to "protect the biologically gifted from the almost inevitable malice of the biologically nongifted." The only way he saw out of this was that the "any future one-world civilization" the "biological superiors (alphas or aggridants)" would need to become a "priestly class to which is given less monetary reward and fewer privileges or luxuries than the average members of the overall population."
The picture I have here is of the leaders of civilization--the sages, teachers, pioneers, and creators--composing something like the Grey Eminence figures of the past, like monks clad in the simplest garments and perhaps vowing to lead selfless lives of poverty.[2]
His ideas is basically to "constitute a board or commission of sages to help humankind make its choices about how to evolve itself, toward which ideal type of human to move, and how to biologically select the good and wise?" He further notes that "this phrasing of the question may be less offensive or frightening than simply to state that some people are biologically superior to others.[3]
Quotes
But quite apart from this, my immediate proposal for biologists is that they recognize that once they have swallowed the normative approach to the human species, or any other species, that is, once they have accepted as their obligation the development of the good specimen, then it becomes equally their scientific obligation to study all those conditions that conduce to the development of the good specimen, and to those conditions that inhibit such development. Obviously, this means emergence from the laboratory and into society.[4]
Maslow Index
- Aggridant
- B-Cognition
- B-Needs
- B-Realm
- B-Values
- Being-Guilt
- Big Problem
- D-Cognition
- D-Realm
- Deficiency Diseases
- Diminished Human Being
- Eupsychia
- Eupsychian Biology
- Eupsychian Education
- Eupsychian Index
- Eupsychian Management
- Eupsychian Psychology
- Eupsychian Science
- Eupsychian Society
- Eupsychian Theory
- Eupsychian Therapist
- Eupsychian Therapy
- Euspychian Methods
- Good Chooser
- Good Person
- Good Science
- Good Society
- Good Specimen
- Growing-Tip Statistics
- Hierarchy of Basic Needs
- Hierarchy of Cognitive Needs
- Horticultural Model
- Human Diminution
- Human Motivation
- Human Potential
- Humanistic Psychology
- Inner Signals
- Intrinsic Conscience
- Jonah Complex
- Metapathology
- Motivation
- Normalcy
- Normative Biology
- Peak Experience
- Plateau Experience
- Real Self
- Sculptural Model
- Self-Actualization
- Transcending Self-Actualizers
- Transhumanistic
Citation and Legal
The SpiritWiki is a freely available, open-access Knowledge System devoted to health, healing, and reconnection. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; citation and attribution are welcomed, but not required. You can help this knowledge system grow by joining its Patreon.
The SpiritWiki is marked CC0 1.0 Universal and in the public domain, free for everyone on the planet to use. Please support its growth.
Footnotes
- ↑ Maslow, A. H. “Toward a Humanistic Biology.” American Psychologist 24, no. 8 (1969): 724–35. doi:10.1037/h0027859.
- ↑ Maslow, Abraham H. “Humanistic Biology: Elitist Implications of the Concept of ‘Full-Humanness.’” In Future Visions: The Unpublished Papers of Abraham Maslow, edited by Edward Hoffman, 70–73. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996. p. 71.
- ↑ Maslow, Abraham H. “Humanistic Biology: Elitist Implications of the Concept of ‘Full-Humanness.’” In Future Visions: The Unpublished Papers of Abraham Maslow, edited by Edward Hoffman, 70–73. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.p. 72
- ↑ Maslow, A. H. “Toward a Humanistic Biology.” American Psychologist 24, no. 8 (1969): 724–35. doi:10.1037/h0027859.