Actions

August Comte: Difference between revisions

An Avatar.Global Resource

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
==== Essay One General Separation between Opinions and Desires” (1819) ====
==== Essay One General Separation between Opinions and Desires” (1819) ====
In '''“General Separation between Opinions and Desires” (1819)''' Comte argues that modern political turmoil is not mainly about clashing interests but about a basic confusion of levels. At the level of '''desires''', societies are surprisingly unified: most people want peace, security, material improvement, and some measure of liberty. The trouble begins at the level of '''opinions''', where people start prescribing the ''means'' to reach those widely shared ends. For Comte, means are not obvious and cannot be supplied “by instinct”; they belong to a distinct, scientific order of knowledge that has to be worked out by a competent intellectual/spiritual authority. He criticizes the rising urban/industrial bourgeoisie for assuming that, because they are the active class of the new era, they can also reorganize society “by instinct alone” — as if practical energy and social science were the same thing. They are not. Until modern societies '''institutionalize the separation''' between legitimate popular desires (ends) and scientifically grounded opinions (means), politics will oscillate between popular impatience and class presumption, with neither able to produce durable order. In germ, the essay already contains Comte’s later solution: create an independent spiritual power, grounded in positive science, whose specific job is to determine and teach the means, while leaving desires and execution to other social strata
In '''“General Separation between Opinions and Desires” (1819)''' Comte argues that modern political turmoil is not mainly about clashing interests but about a basic confusion of levels. At the level of '''desires''', societies are surprisingly unified: most people want peace, security, material improvement, and some measure of liberty. The trouble begins at the level of '''opinions''', where people start prescribing the ''means'' to reach those widely shared ends. For Comte, means are not obvious and cannot be supplied “by instinct”; they belong to a distinct, scientific order of knowledge that has to be worked out by a competent intellectual/spiritual authority. He criticizes the rising urban/industrial bourgeoisie for assuming that, because they are the active class of the new era, they can also reorganize society “by instinct alone” — as if practical energy and social science were the same thing. They are not. Until modern societies '''institutionalize the separation''' between legitimate popular desires (ends) and scientifically grounded opinions (means), politics will oscillate between popular impatience and class presumption, with neither able to produce durable order. In germ, the essay already contains Comte’s later solution: create an independent spiritual power, grounded in positive science, whose specific job is to determine and teach the means, while leaving desires and execution to other social strata
==== Essay Two: Summary Appraisal of the General Character of Modern History ====
In his second early essay Comte reads European “modern history” as a '''long revolution''' set in motion as soon as the complete Catholic–feudal order (spiritual + temporal) coexisted with the rising '''communes''' (urban/bourgeois towns) from the 11th century onward. Once the two medieval powers began to quarrel, “decadence” was certain; the communes then acted as a third force, allying with one branch of the temporal power to break the other, in France as well as in England. '''The Reformation''' finished the job by overthrowing spiritual unity and by legitimizing criticism. Beneath these surface struggles lay two deeper, irreversible drivers — the advance of '''science''' and '''industry''' — which made a theological–military regime structurally untenable. The result, Comte says, is an “inevitable era of anarchy” whose length matches the scale of the transition and which can only be closed by creating a new, positive spiritual power.
In Comte’s reading of modern European history, the long revolution begins when the medieval spiritual power breaks down, and it will not close until a new, positive spiritual authority reinstates a binding moral rule capable of making divergent industrial and class interests converge. Without that authority, interests oppose one another; with it, they can be “contained within limits.” That is why the creation of a new '''spiritual/moral powe'''r is an '''essential component''' of the long revolution, not a later embellishment. A new spiritual power ensures that the general point of view is institutionally present in society, so that particular class interests, market logics, and administrative routines are continually recalled to common ends and made to converge rather than collide


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 00:54, 3 November 2025

August Comte

Auguste Comte (1798-1857) was a French philosopher and sociologist, best known for coining the term Sociology[1] and for formulating the doctrine of Positivism. Comte is generally associated with the shift from theological and metaphysical speculation to a rigorously empirical, historically grounded understanding of human and social life. However, his ambitions were much larger than “method” or “epistemology.” From his earliest political writings to the ''Catechism of Positivism'', Comte aimed to create a Comprehensive Framework capable of reclaiming what he called “the general direction of this world” and of “constitut[ing] at length a real Providence, in all departments—moral, intellectual, and material.”<ref>Auguste Comte, ''The Catechism of Positivism'', trans. Richard Congreve (London: John Chapman, 1858), Preface, p. 1–2.</ref>

Comte's Terms

Comprehensive Framework, Intellectual Order, Moral Order, Positivist Regime, Religion of Humanity, Societal Order, Sociocrat, The Regime

Writings

Early Political Writings[2]

The early political writings collected in Comte: Early Political Writings (ed. H. S. Jones, Cambridge, 1998) bring together Comte’s 1819–1824 texts written before the Course of Positive Philosophy, when he was still working out the political implications of Positivism. In these essays Comte already diagnoses modern Europe as caught in a prolonged transition from the medieval Catholic–feudal order to a new industrial, scientific order; he argues that this “long revolution” cannot be resolved by constitutional tinkering or reactionary restorations, but only by completing the “scientific work necessary for the reorganization of society.” He sketches the law of the three stages, defends the need for an independent spiritual power distinct from temporal/industrial power, and insists that political direction must rest on a comprehensive, positive doctrine. Read together, these writings show that Comte’s later Religion of Humanity was not an afterthought but the maturation of a project visible from the start: to rebuild a unifying intellectual–moral authority for modern society on an empirical, sociological basis.

Essay One General Separation between Opinions and Desires” (1819)

In “General Separation between Opinions and Desires” (1819) Comte argues that modern political turmoil is not mainly about clashing interests but about a basic confusion of levels. At the level of desires, societies are surprisingly unified: most people want peace, security, material improvement, and some measure of liberty. The trouble begins at the level of opinions, where people start prescribing the means to reach those widely shared ends. For Comte, means are not obvious and cannot be supplied “by instinct”; they belong to a distinct, scientific order of knowledge that has to be worked out by a competent intellectual/spiritual authority. He criticizes the rising urban/industrial bourgeoisie for assuming that, because they are the active class of the new era, they can also reorganize society “by instinct alone” — as if practical energy and social science were the same thing. They are not. Until modern societies institutionalize the separation between legitimate popular desires (ends) and scientifically grounded opinions (means), politics will oscillate between popular impatience and class presumption, with neither able to produce durable order. In germ, the essay already contains Comte’s later solution: create an independent spiritual power, grounded in positive science, whose specific job is to determine and teach the means, while leaving desires and execution to other social strata

Essay Two: Summary Appraisal of the General Character of Modern History

In his second early essay Comte reads European “modern history” as a long revolution set in motion as soon as the complete Catholic–feudal order (spiritual + temporal) coexisted with the rising communes (urban/bourgeois towns) from the 11th century onward. Once the two medieval powers began to quarrel, “decadence” was certain; the communes then acted as a third force, allying with one branch of the temporal power to break the other, in France as well as in England. The Reformation finished the job by overthrowing spiritual unity and by legitimizing criticism. Beneath these surface struggles lay two deeper, irreversible drivers — the advance of science and industry — which made a theological–military regime structurally untenable. The result, Comte says, is an “inevitable era of anarchy” whose length matches the scale of the transition and which can only be closed by creating a new, positive spiritual power.

In Comte’s reading of modern European history, the long revolution begins when the medieval spiritual power breaks down, and it will not close until a new, positive spiritual authority reinstates a binding moral rule capable of making divergent industrial and class interests converge. Without that authority, interests oppose one another; with it, they can be “contained within limits.” That is why the creation of a new spiritual/moral power is an essential component of the long revolution, not a later embellishment. A new spiritual power ensures that the general point of view is institutionally present in society, so that particular class interests, market logics, and administrative routines are continually recalled to common ends and made to converge rather than collide

Notes

Key Contributions

  1. Founder of Sociology: Comte is credited with establishing sociology as a distinct academic discipline. He believed that the study of society could be approached with the same scientific rigor as the natural sciences.
  2. Theory of Positivism: Comte's Positivism asserts that only scientific knowledge derived from empirical evidence and logical reasoning is valid. He rejected metaphysical and theological explanations, advocating for a secular, science-based approach to understanding and organizing society.
  3. Religion of Humanity:[3] Comte proposed a new secular religion, the "Religion of Humanity," which aimed to replace traditional theological religions. This new religion was intended to provide a comprehensive moral and intellectual framework to unify society and promote social progress. It included rituals, a priesthood, and a calendar of Positivist saints, all designed to foster social cohesion and moral order.

Comte's Views on Religion

Comte viewed religion as a fundamental social institution necessary for moral, intellectual, and material order. He believed traditional theological religions were outdated and disruptive, advocating for a religion based on positive (scientific) principles. This new religion should guide human activity towards the collective well-being of humanity, integrating moral guidance with scientific understanding.

Key aspects of Comte's vision of religion include:

  1. Tool of Social Control: Comte saw religion as a tool for organizing society, particularly in developing and exploiting planetary resources, aligning with the interests of the accumulating class. This reflects the use of religion as a means to maintain social order and economic control.
  2. Comprehensive Framework: Comte proposed a new secular religion, the "Religion of Humanity," to replace traditional theological religions. This framework, or "Creation Template" in LP terminology, integrates moral, intellectual, and social orders to create a unified and progressive society.

Influence on the Lightning Path (LP)

Comte's ideas align with the Lightning Path's emphasis on scientific principles and the use of comprehensive frameworks, known in LP terms as "Creation Templates." These templates organize human experience and activity towards specific ends, integrating moral, intellectual, and social orders. The LP's approach echoes Comte's vision of using structured, scientifically grounded frameworks to achieve social harmony and personal, social, economic, and political development.

Differences from Comte's Vision

While Comte's vision includes valuable insights, the Lightning Path (LP) diverges from his views in several key ways:

  1. Inclusivity: The LP is neither sexist, racist, nor elitist. It believes that everyone has the potential to grow into a healthy, intelligent, bright, empowered, and connected individual, regardless of their background.
  2. Gender Equality: Unlike Comte, who confined women to traditional domestic roles, the LP promotes gender equality and the full participation of women in all aspects of society.
  3. Empowerment for All: The LP rejects the idea of a sociocracy governed by intellectual elites. Instead, it advocates for empowering all individuals through education, healing, and spiritual practices to achieve their full potential.

Integration into the Lightning Path (LP) Context

Within the Lightning Path framework, a Comprehensive Framework or Human Development Framework organizes human thought and activity towards specific ends. The LP creation template organized human thought and activity towards Healing and Connection and includes various elements that align with Comte's ideas, such as the integration of scientific principles and the promotion of social cohesion. The Lightning Path Human Development Framework aims to foster healing, connection, and the realization of human potential, overcoming the damage caused by Toxic Socialization and promoting a holistic approach to personal and societal transformation.

Comte's Religion as an Ideological Institution and Symbol Factory

In the context of the Lightning Path, Comte's vision of religion can be seen as an example of an Ideological Institution and a Symbol Factory:

  • [[Ideological Institution]: Comte's Religion of Humanity serves as an ideological institution, distributing and reinforcing a structured framework or Creation Template that aligns with the interests of the accumulating class. It aims to provide a comprehensive moral and intellectual order that supports social control and economic organization.
  • Symbol Factory: As a Symbol Factory, Comte's new religion creates and disseminates symbols, rituals, and narratives that promote the values and goals of the Accumulating Class. This process involves shaping public consciousness and guiding societal behavior in ways that support the existing power structures.

In LP terms, Comte can be seen as an Agent of Consciousness, a type of System Agent focused on creating and updating the accumulating class's Creation Template. His efforts to establish a new religion reflect his role in constructing and propagating an ideological framework that serves to maintain and enhance the power and interests of the accumulating class.

Three phases of Religion, Theological (existence explained through Gods), Metaphysical (existence explained through abstractions/philosophy), positive (through positive/empirical science). [4]

Citation and Legal

Treat the SpiritWiki as an open-access online monograph or structured textbook. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; however, attribution, citation, and/or direct linking are ethically required.

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Anthony Giddens, Sociology, 9th ed. (Polity Press, 2021).
  2. ↑ Comte, Auguste. Comte: Early Political Writings. Edited by H. S. Jones. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  3. ↑ Auguste Comte, The Catechism of Positivism; or, Summary Exposition of the Universal Religion, trans. Richard Congreve (London: John Chapman, 1852). https://archive.org/details/artofcreationess00carp
  4. ↑ Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000.
Retrieved from "https://spiritwiki.lightningpath.org/index.php?title=August_Comte&oldid=36219"