Masonic Tarot: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navmenu}} | {{navmenu}} | ||
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | ||
<blockquote class="definition">The '''Masonic Tarot''' is a [[Creation Tempate | <blockquote class="definition">The '''Masonic Tarot''' is a [[Creation Tempate]] developed by Freemasons for the explicit purpose of facilitating the transition from [[Feudalism]] and feudal authority relations to [[Capitalism]] and capitalist authority relations.<ref>Sosteric, Mike. “A Sociology of Tarot.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 39, no. 3 (2014). https://www.academia.edu/25055505/</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 24 December 2022
Masonic Tarot
The Masonic Tarot is a Creation Tempate developed by Freemasons for the explicit purpose of facilitating the transition from Feudalism and feudal authority relations to Capitalism and capitalist authority relations.[1]
Syncretic Terms
Notes
The LP refers to the Masonic Tarot as the Fool's Tarot.
The world’s foremost tarot scholars suggest that the Tarot has been the "...most successful propaganda campaign ever launched; not by a very long way the most important, but the most completely successful. An entire false history, and false interpretation, of the Tarot pack was concocted by occultist; and it is all but universally believed. "[2]
For additional details, please refer to the Fool's Tarot
Citation and Legal
Treat the SpiritWiki as an open-access online monograph or structured textbook. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; however, attribution, citation, and/or direct linking are ethically required.
Footnotes
- ↑ Sosteric, Mike. “A Sociology of Tarot.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 39, no. 3 (2014). https://www.academia.edu/25055505/
- ↑ Decker, Ronald, Thierry Depaulis, and Michael Dummett. A Wicked Pack of Cards: The Origins of the Occult Tarot. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1996. p. 27.