Surface Framework: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<blockquote class="definition"> | <blockquote class="definition"> | ||
The '''Surface Framework''' is the complete set of concepts and ideas that define the nature, scope, and purpose of an [[Institution]] and that are explicitly provided to participants. | The '''Surface Framework''' is the complete set of concepts and ideas that define the nature, scope, and purpose of an [[Institution]] and that are explicitly provided to participants. By contrast, the [[Hidden Framework]] is the institution's true, often spoken of only in private, purpose. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Because society's current set of institutions primarily services the needs of the [[Accumulating Class]], most institutions have both a surface framework (the ideas and justifications taught to the masses) and a [[Hidden Framework]], something typically not spoken of explicitly, at least to the general public. A teacher for example will teach that schools are there to create educated, hard-working, democracy-loving young adults. Teachers will not tell you (perhaps because they themselves do not understand, or perhaps because they have been led to believe in the moral rectitude of the current educational system) that schools also teach a [[Hidden Curriculum]]<ref>Anyon, Jean. “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.” ''Journal of Education'' 162, no. 1 (1980). https://www.jstor.org/stable/42741976.</ref> designed to create a compliant and subservient working class. | Because society's current set of institutions primarily services the needs of the [[Accumulating Class]], most institutions have both a surface framework (the ideas and justifications taught to the masses) and a [[Hidden Framework]], something typically not spoken of explicitly, at least to the general public. A teacher for example will teach that schools are there to create educated, hard-working, democracy-loving young adults. Teachers will not tell you (perhaps because they themselves do not understand, or perhaps because they have been led to believe in the moral rectitude of the current educational system) that schools also teach a [[Hidden Curriculum]]<ref>Anyon, Jean. “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.” ''Journal of Education'' 162, no. 1 (1980). https://www.jstor.org/stable/42741976.</ref> designed to create a compliant and subservient working class. | ||
{{curriculum}} | |||
{{patreon}} | |||
{{allaboutinstitutions}} | |||
{{endstuff}} | {{endstuff}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:33, 13 November 2024
The Surface Framework is the complete set of concepts and ideas that define the nature, scope, and purpose of an Institution and that are explicitly provided to participants. By contrast, the Hidden Framework is the institution's true, often spoken of only in private, purpose.
Institutional Framework Types
Institutional Framework > Hidden Framework, Surface Framework
Syncretic Terms
Related LP Terms
Non-LP Related Terms
Notes
The conceptual framework of an institution may be overt and "on the surface" (Surface Framework or covert and hidden from view (Hidden Framework))
Because society's current set of institutions primarily services the needs of the Accumulating Class, most institutions have both a surface framework (the ideas and justifications taught to the masses) and a Hidden Framework, something typically not spoken of explicitly, at least to the general public. A teacher for example will teach that schools are there to create educated, hard-working, democracy-loving young adults. Teachers will not tell you (perhaps because they themselves do not understand, or perhaps because they have been led to believe in the moral rectitude of the current educational system) that schools also teach a Hidden Curriculum[1] designed to create a compliant and subservient working class.
Curriculum/Courseware
Patreon Units
Footnotes
- ↑ Anyon, Jean. “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.” Journal of Education 162, no. 1 (1980). https://www.jstor.org/stable/42741976.
