Magick: Difference between revisions

From The SpiritWiki
m (Text replacement - "<div class=" to "<blockquote class=")
(Text replacement - "]]" to " [[")
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{template:emanationnav}}
<blockquote class="definition">Magick is [[Aleister Crowley]]'s term for [[Creation Practice]]</blockquote>


<blockquote class="definition">Magick is [[Aleister Crowley]]'s naseautingly pretentious term for [[Spiritual Creation]]</blockquote>
==Syncretic Terms==


==Syncretic Terms==
[[Creation Practice]] > {{#ask:[[Is a syncretic term::Creation Practice]]}}
 
==Notes==
 
According to Crowley, Magick could be used for instrumental ends or it could be used for "the Invocation of the Holy Guardian Angel; or, in the language of Mysticism, union with God."<ref>Magick in Theory and Practice, p. xii.</ref>
 
Also, Magick is "Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel," which is equated with an "individual's Holy Guardian Angel," or union with the "Higher Self."Aleister Crowley, “Th e Initiated Interpretation of Ceremonial Magic,” in Crowley
and Mathers (eds.), The Goetia , 15–20
 
Crowley had a reductionist/psychological/material view of Magick, at times
 
<blockquote>If, then, I say, with Solomon: “The Spirit Cimieries teaches logic,” what I mean is: “Those portions of my brain which subserve the logical faculty may be stimulated and developed by following out the processes called ‘The Invocation of Cimieries.’” And this a purely materialistic rational statement.<ref>Aleister Crowley, “The Initiated Interpretation of Ceremonial Magic,” in Crowley and Mathers (eds.), The Goetia , 15–20</ref></blockquote>
 
It is unclear how this notion would reconcile with Crowley's own "action at a distance" view of magick. In fact, it is clear that at other times he did consider spiritual entities as having an existence independent of the physical unit.<ref>Pasi, Marco. “Varieties of Magical Experience: Aleister Crowley’s Views on Occult Practice.” In Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism, edited by Henrik Bogdan and Martin P. Starr, 53–88. Oxford University Press, 2012.</ref>
 
{{endstuff}}


[[Spiritual Creation]] > {{#ask:[[Is a syncretic term::Spiritual Creation]]}}


[[category:terms]][[Is a syncretic term::Spiritual Creation| ]]
[[category:terms]]
[[Is a syncretic term::Creation Practice| ]]
[[Is a related term::Emanation| ]]
[[Is a syncretic term::Creation Practice| ]]

Latest revision as of 09:03, 19 December 2022

Magick is Aleister Crowley's term for Creation Practice

Syncretic Terms

Creation Practice > Magic, Magick

Notes

According to Crowley, Magick could be used for instrumental ends or it could be used for "the Invocation of the Holy Guardian Angel; or, in the language of Mysticism, union with God."[1]

Also, Magick is "Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel," which is equated with an "individual's Holy Guardian Angel," or union with the "Higher Self."Aleister Crowley, “Th e Initiated Interpretation of Ceremonial Magic,” in Crowley and Mathers (eds.), The Goetia , 15–20

Crowley had a reductionist/psychological/material view of Magick, at times

If, then, I say, with Solomon: “The Spirit Cimieries teaches logic,” what I mean is: “Those portions of my brain which subserve the logical faculty may be stimulated and developed by following out the processes called ‘The Invocation of Cimieries.’” And this a purely materialistic rational statement.[2]

It is unclear how this notion would reconcile with Crowley's own "action at a distance" view of magick. In fact, it is clear that at other times he did consider spiritual entities as having an existence independent of the physical unit.[3]

Footnotes

  1. Magick in Theory and Practice, p. xii.
  2. Aleister Crowley, “The Initiated Interpretation of Ceremonial Magic,” in Crowley and Mathers (eds.), The Goetia , 15–20
  3. Pasi, Marco. “Varieties of Magical Experience: Aleister Crowley’s Views on Occult Practice.” In Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism, edited by Henrik Bogdan and Martin P. Starr, 53–88. Oxford University Press, 2012.