Cognitive Interests: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
Text replacement - "]]" to " [[" |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navmenu}} | {{navmenu}} | ||
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | ||
<blockquote class="definition"> | <blockquote class="definition">Jürgen Habermas' concept of '''cognitive interests''' is central to his epistemological framework in ''Knowledge and Human Interests'' (1968). He argues that knowledge is not purely objective or value-neutral but is shaped by underlying human interests. He identifies three primary types of cognitive interests, each tied to different forms of knowledge production: Technical Interest, Practical Interest, and Emancipatory Interest</blockquote> | ||
</blockquote> | |||
== | == Concept Map == | ||
=== Key Terms === | |||
===== Related LP Terms ===== | |||
[[Cognitive Interests]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related LP term::Cognitive Interests]]}} | [[Cognitive Interests]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related LP term::Cognitive Interests]]}} | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 18 March 2025
Cognitive Interests
Jürgen Habermas' concept of cognitive interests is central to his epistemological framework in Knowledge and Human Interests (1968). He argues that knowledge is not purely objective or value-neutral but is shaped by underlying human interests. He identifies three primary types of cognitive interests, each tied to different forms of knowledge production: Technical Interest, Practical Interest, and Emancipatory Interest
Concept Map
Non-LP Related Terms
Notes
Technical interests = aspects of knowledge and action concerned with manipulating the environment.
Practical interests = aspects of knowledge and action concerned with extending understanding and consensus.
Emancipatory interests = liberation from "historically contingent restraints through self-reflection. [1]
Citation and Legal
Treat the SpiritWiki as an open-access online monograph or structured textbook. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; however, attribution, citation, and/or direct linking are ethically required.
Footnotes
- ↑ Scott, John P. “Critical Social Theory: An Introduction and Critique.” The British Journal of Sociology 29, no. 1 (1978): 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/589216. p. 2