Mode of Exploitation: Difference between revisions

From The SpiritWiki
No edit summary
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<blockquote class="definition">
<blockquote class="definition">
The '''Mode of Exploitation''' is the manner in which the [[Ruling Class]] goes about creating the intellectual and spiritual conditions conducive to extraction and accumulation of labour value.<ref>Sosteric. Rocket Scientists’ Guide to Money and the Economy: Accumulation and Debt. St Albert, Alberta: Lightning Path Press., 2016.</ref>
According to Ruyle,"<ref>Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 12</ref> the '''Mode of Exploitation''' is the manner in which the [[Accumulating Class ]] goes about creating conditions conducive to the accumulation of [[Labour Value]] from the [[Slave Class]]es. The phrase "Mode of Exploitation" is a term syncretic with the LP term [[Mode of Accumulation]].
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


==Related Terms==
==Syncretic Terms==


{{#ask:[[Is a related term::Mode of Exploitation]]}}
[[Mode of Accumulation]] > {{#ask:[[Is a syncretic term::The System]]}}


==Notes==
==Notes==


According to Ruyle<ref>Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 11</ref>  
According to Ruyle<ref>Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 11</ref> any specific Mode of Exploitation consists of three interrelated aspects; these aspects include  
any specific Mode of Exploitation consists of three interrelated factors; these factors include  


#'''Exploitative Techniques''' (i.e. the mechanisms through which economic surplus is extracted, what we might also call a [[Regime of Accumulation]]),  
#'''[[Exploitative Techniques]]''' (i.e. the mechanisms through which economic surplus is extracted,  
#'''[[Mechanisms of Force]]''' (like the police and the army who are called in to ensure regimes of extraction continue by physically coercing the population if necessary), and  
#'''[[Mechanisms of Force]]''' (like the police and the army who are called in to ensure regimes of extraction continue by physically coercing the population if necessary), and  
#'''Ideological Institutions''' (like the elementary education system, the Catholic church, Hollywood, and the family, tasked with controlling the minds of the exploited populations.  
#'''[[Ideological Institutions]]''' (like the elementary education system, the Catholic Church, Hollywood, and the family, tasked with controlling the minds of the exploited populations.  


According to Ruyle (1975: pp. 11-12) “These elements of the exploitative system may be institutionalized separately, as in industrial societies such as the United States and the Soviet Union, or they may be integrated into a single unitary institution, as in the early Bronze Age. The precise ensemble of exploitative techniques, together with the manner in which state-church elements are institutionalized, constitutes a historical mode of exploitation.
Ideological Institutions provide the [[Ideological Infrastructure]] by which compliance is ensured.  


According to Ruyle (1975: pp. 11-12) “These elements of the exploitative system may be institutionalized separately, as in industrial societies such as the United States and the Soviet Union, or they may be integrated into a single unitary institution, as in the early Bronze Age. The precise ensemble of exploitative techniques, together with the manner in which state-church elements are institutionalized, constitutes a historical mode of exploitation.” <ref>Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 12</ref>
According to Ruyle, "The existence of a mode of exploitation is both necessary and sufficient to explain the existence of differential wealth and privilege in class-structured societies."<ref>Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 12</ref>
{{endstuff}}
{{endstuff}}


[[category:terms]][[category:RSGME]][[Is a related term::Ideological Institution| ]][[Is a related term::Symbol Factory| ]][[Is a related term::Hidden Curriculum| ]][[s a related term::Regime of Accumulation| ]]
"The exploitative system is the instrumentality through which a predator-prey relationship is established within the human species, only here the stakes are human labor energy rather than energy locked up in animal flesh." <ref>Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 11</ref>
 
[[category:terms]]
[[Is a syncretic term::Regime of Accumulation]]}}

Latest revision as of 18:57, 14 July 2024

According to Ruyle,"[1] the Mode of Exploitation is the manner in which the Accumulating Class goes about creating conditions conducive to the accumulation of Labour Value from the Slave Classes. The phrase "Mode of Exploitation" is a term syncretic with the LP term Mode of Accumulation.

Syncretic Terms

Mode of Accumulation > Mode of Exploitation, Old World, The Machine, The Matrix, The Wheel

Notes

According to Ruyle[2] any specific Mode of Exploitation consists of three interrelated aspects; these aspects include

  1. Exploitative Techniques (i.e. the mechanisms through which economic surplus is extracted,
  2. Mechanisms of Force (like the police and the army who are called in to ensure regimes of extraction continue by physically coercing the population if necessary), and
  3. Ideological Institutions (like the elementary education system, the Catholic Church, Hollywood, and the family, tasked with controlling the minds of the exploited populations.

Ideological Institutions provide the Ideological Infrastructure by which compliance is ensured.

According to Ruyle (1975: pp. 11-12) “These elements of the exploitative system may be institutionalized separately, as in industrial societies such as the United States and the Soviet Union, or they may be integrated into a single unitary institution, as in the early Bronze Age. The precise ensemble of exploitative techniques, together with the manner in which state-church elements are institutionalized, constitutes a historical mode of exploitation.” [3]

According to Ruyle, "The existence of a mode of exploitation is both necessary and sufficient to explain the existence of differential wealth and privilege in class-structured societies."[4]

Footnotes

  1. Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 12
  2. Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 11
  3. Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 12
  4. Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 12

"The exploitative system is the instrumentality through which a predator-prey relationship is established within the human species, only here the stakes are human labor energy rather than energy locked up in animal flesh." [1] Regime of Accumulation}}

  1. Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 11