Human Nature

• SpiritWiki
• Eupsychia
• LPHDF
  • LP HEALING Framework
  • LP Creative Framework
  • LP Connection Framework
  • LP Educational Framework
  • LP Psychological Framework
    • Consciousness
    • Connection Capacity
    • Connection-Centered Psychology
  • LP Metaphysical Framework
• PEM
  • Pathfinder Pedagogical Framework
    • The Four-Point Foundation
    • The Seven Pillars
    • Pathfinder Root Structure
      • Mind-Body Connection
      • Spirit-Mind Connection
  • Pathfinder Pedagogical Foundations
    • Trauma-Informed Education
    • Life-Centered Education
    • Healing and Connection-Centered
    • Minimally Invasive Education
    • Needs-Satisfying Education
    • Relational Education
      • Dialogic Method
      • Praxis
    • Post-Capitalist Skills
  • Pathfinder Delivery Framework
    • Learning Hub
    • Learning Pod
    • Healing Space
    • Connection Space
    • Learning Series
  • Pathfinder Institute
  • Pathfinder Curriculum
  • Pathfinder AI
    • AI In Education
    • Pathfinder Medium Account
• Avatar.GLOBAL
  • Evolutionary Theory
  • Critical Theory
    • Narrative
      • Creation Template
      • Master Narrative
    • Praxis
• Support

Human Nature

Human Nature is the inherent developmental architecture of the human organism—a "higher nature" comprising positive potentials that are actualized under conditions of Sufficient Satisfaction of Essential Needs, and that are suppressed or distorted under conditions of deprivation and Toxic Socialization.

Concept Map

Key Terms

Eupsychia >

• Abraham Maslow
• Eupsychian Education
• Eupsychian Management
• Eupsychian Psychology
• Eupsychian Theory
• Eupsychian Therapy
• Humanistic Psychology
• Transpersonal Psychology

Eupsychian Theory >

• Good Society
• Human Development
• Human Motivation
• Human Nature
• Human Pathology
• Human Potential

Human Nature >

• Intrinsic Conscience
• Peak Experience
• Plateau Experience
• Real Self

Core Tenets of Human Nature (Maslow/LP Framework)

1. Higher Nature is Good, Not Evil

Human nature is not inherently selfish, aggressive, or "fallen." Under good environmental conditions (characterized by satisfaction of the Seven Essential Needs), humans reliably manifest:

• Affection and altruism
• Friendliness and generosity
• Honesty, kindness, and trust

Negative traits (cruelty, sadism, selfishness) are not intrinsic—they are reactive and sick responses to deprivation, threat, and need frustration.

2. Need Gratification as Primary Path

Basic-need gratification is the only reliable pathway to higher evolution and self-actualization. Higher human nature cannot be willed into existence—it must be nurtured (see Maslow's Horticultural Model, through consistent, sufficient satisfaction of physiological, emotional, cognitive, psychological, and environmental needs.

3. Social and Intrapsychic Are Inseparable

Human nature does not develop in isolation. Basic-need gratifications must come from:

• Interpersonal relationships
• Membership in subgroups
• Connection to wider society

The "self-made" individual is a myth—human nature unfolds through embedded, supported social connection.

4. Positive Traits Are Strengthened by Revelation

Positive human traits are strengthened and confirmed by successful Taoistic uncovering, insight, and revelation. Negative traits are destroyed by the same process. This suggests positive traits are intrinsic (uncovered), while negative traits are acquired (and can be dismantled).

5. Selfishness vs. Unselfishness Are Developmental, Not Moral

• Healthy unselfishness = phenomenon of inner abundance from basic gratification
• Unhealthy selfishness = phenomenon of inner poverty from basic deprivation

The same outward behavior (giving, helping) can be healthy (stemming from abundance) or unhealthy (stemming from manipulative need-meeting). Motivation matters more than appearance.

Rejection of Limited Frameworks

Maslow (and the LP) reject:

• Animal comparison models – Humans cannot be understood by reference to chimps, wolves, or rabbits. This is "pseudo-Darwinian" fallacy.
• "Caveman" speculation – We know too little about prehistoric humans to draw conclusions.
• Theological pessimism – The doctrine of "inherent evil" is a lingering Zoroastrian/Christian frame, not empirical observation.

Lightning Path Extension: Human Nature as Connection-Potential

Building on Maslow, the Lightning Path frames human nature as Connection-Potential—the innate capacity of the Physical Unit (body) to achieve Alignment and Connection with the Spiritual Ego (higher Self) when Seven Essential Needs are met. Human nature is not fixed traits but developmental potential that expresses as:

• Growth Mode when needs are satisfied
• Deficit Mode when needs are frustrated

This makes "human nature" context-dependent rather than essence-fixed—a revolutionary shift from traditional psychology.

Notes

Human nature is not what humans are—it is what humans become when their essential developmental needs are met. The task is not to constrain nature but to create the conditions where human nature can unfold toward its highest possibilities.

Abraham Maslow

Maslow rejected the idea that human nature could be understood by pointing to the animal kingdom. He Eupsychian Theoryfelt it was absurd, noting "We can never make meaningful statements about human nature by arguing on the basis of other species’ behavior," noting that when one did this one's view of human nature became entirely dependent upon the animals once chose for comparison. Are chimp, wolf, tiger. Or are we rabbit, squirrel, or dear. It's a dumb "pseudo-Darwinian" approach whose fallacy has been demonstrated well enough so that no repetition is required."

He also rejected the notion that human nature could be understood by looking at "cave dwellers." He rightly pointed out that we really don't know much about these people and how they lived at all.

Maslow does point out that "observational data in the wild" have demonstrated that chimpanzees "will help their peers, such as giving of their own food." and that "The stronger chimpanzee is the protector rather than the dominator of the weaker," concluding that the general direction of this primate's behaviour is towards "cooperation, friendship, and unselfishness."

Maslow suggest that that human beings are capable of more than just being "bad," that human society does not inevitably lead to negative outcomes. "Nor is it inevitable, as so many theologians and left-wing/right-wing political radicals proclaim, that human nature is inherently evil and incapable of growing into something better. The humanistic and transpersonal synthesis of psychology today knocks these ideas on their head or, at least, strongly contradicts them."

In his unpublished essay "What is the essence of human nature?" Maslow makes the following statements on human nature.

1. Humans have a "higher nature" that "composes a basic part of our essence."
2. This higher nature is good and can be actualized "Under good conditions." "Under good conditions, people can be expected to manifest such desirable traits as affection, altruism, friendliness, generosity, honesty, kindness, and trust." Note that Maslow rejects the notion that humans are basically good, saying that humans are good or evil under specific conditions. "Under 'bad' environmental conditions, people are more likely to show both psychopathology and evil behaviour."
3. Good environmental conditions are comprised of the "natural, social, and physiological aspects that foster Self-Actualization."
4. "Basic-need gratification...composes the primary path for higher evolvement and humanness and greater self-actualization."
5. Humans do not exist in a vacuum. The "social element is inescapably intertwined with the intrapsychic, because basic-need gratifications--which are necessary for growth in the individual's higher nature--must come from interpersonal relations, various subgroups, and the wider society."
6. There is a Culture of Despair that views human nature through a cynical and skeptical lens. This culture rejects Maslow's more positive view of human nature and human potential, basically arguing that humans are evil, incapable of goodness, selfish, etc. Maslow attributes this to the general "debunking" that occurred as philosophy and science took over from religion, but his argument is quite unconvincing here. The idea that humans are evil, savage, brutish, primitive is a lingering religious idea rooted in the Western Zoroastrian Frame.

Sources

The Inner Self

Maslow makes the fascinating observation that "positive human traits" like self-respect, security, safety, being lovable, loving someone else..." are strengthened and confirmed by revelation (what he calls "uncovering and insight.") and that "negative human trains like cruelty, sadism, or masochism are destroyed by successful Taoistic, uncovering..." He also suggest that this is evidence that positive human traits are "intrinsic aspects of humanness" while the negative ones are "reactive and sick."

The Environment

Picking up where Maslow left off, there is a lot of work to be done uncovering the environmental conditions that produce Psychological Dysfunction. Maslow did provide some hints.

Maslow felt that aspects of human nature, like the trait of selfishness versus the trait of unselfishness, might have social/political roots. He is very clear about this. He said that

Selfishness correlates with emotional insecurity and unselfishness with emotional security, self-actualization, and psychological health in general. Thus, we can say that unselfishness tends to be a phenomenon of inner abundance, or relative basic gratification. Selfishness can be seen as a phenomenon of basic deprivation, inner poverty, and threat-past or present.

Further...

It is commonplace for the clinician to assume that selfish, hostile, or nasty behavior generally arises from some insult or damage to the individual’s own basic needs. It is ordinarily expected to be a phenomenon of thwarting, frustration, and conflict, whether arising in the past or the present.

Notice Maslow's interesting use of the word "commonplace" here. Clinicians of the time assumed that "insult or damage to the individual's own basic needs" was the root of selfish, hostile, and nasty behaviour.

Above he is basically saying that neglect of Essential Needs creates selfish people. He may be right. People who have experienced chronic neglect of their essential needs operate in what we call Deficit Mode, a mode of behaviour wherein most of the individual's daily energy goes into meeting unmet needs. Their energy is directed in a "self-ish" direction where everything around them becomes a thing they need to meet their unmet needs.

Maslow distinguished between "Healthy Selfishness" and "Unhealthy Selfishness," "Healthy Unselfishness" and "Healthy Selfishness." He felt that the motivation behind a particular Personality Characteristic or act, like selfishness, was important. He says that "it is necessary to differentiate between healthy selfishness and unhealthy selfishness as well as between healthy unselfishness and unhealthy unselfishness" saying that "outward behavior may seem to be selfish or unselfish, but so may the motivation behind it." A parent might, for example, engage in altruistic acts of support for their children, but for purely selfish reasons.

He further goes on to say that it is deprivation of basic needs, specifically those involving the Environmental Needs for safety and security, that create healthy and unhealthy selfishniess.

An examination of such emotionally healthy persons shows that when they behave unselfishly, this behavior tends to be a phenomenon of personal abundance stemming from relative basic gratification. It comes out of inner riches rather than inner poverty. The same kind of examination of neurotic persons will show that their selfish behavior is typically a phenomenon of basic deprivation involving threat, insecurity, and inner poverty.

Quotes

OBSERVATIONS IN CHILDREN

It is possible to see very clearly in children the phenomenon that we have been describing. Unfortunately, it is usually accepted without further investigation that children are primarily selfish, much more so than adults. How such a conclusion could ever have been reached is hard to fathom, because even the most casual observation of children—at least of those who are emotionally healthy—will reveal many examples of truly altruistic, generous, unselfish behavior. Indeed, youngsters who are raised well and who are psychologically sound are apt to present to their parents problems related to unselfishness as often as selfishness. For example, such children are as likely to give away their expensive toys as to snatch these same toys away from peers.

Children’s altruism has not been experimentally tested because admittedly it is difficult to measure. But this obstacle hardly negates the definite presence of unselfish traits in youngsters. Clearly, there is a lot of evidence already amassed to suggest that humans have a strong, inborn capacity for unselfishness.

Where is all this evidence that he is referring to, I wonder.

Citation and Legal

Treat the SpiritWiki as an open-access online monograph or structured textbook. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; however, attribution, citation, and/or direct linking are ethically required.

Footnotes

References