Mode of Exploitation: Difference between revisions
From The SpiritWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{endstuff}} | {{endstuff}} | ||
[[category:terms]][[category:RSGME]][[Is a related term::Ideological Institution| ]][[Is a related term::Symbol Factory| ]][[Is a related term::Hidden Curriculum| ]] | [[category:terms]][[category:RSGME]][[Is a related term::Ideological Institution| ]][[Is a related term::Symbol Factory| ]][[Is a related term::Hidden Curriculum| ]][[s a related term::Regime of Accumulation| ]] | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 3 Haziran 2020
The Mode of Exploitation is the manner in which the Ruling Class goes about creating the intellectual and spiritual conditions conducive to extraction and accumulation of labour value.[1]
Related Terms
Notes
According to Ruyle[2] any specific Mode of Exploitation consists of three interrelated factors; these factors include
- Exploitative Techniques (i.e. the mechanisms through which economic surplus is extracted, what we might also call a Regime of Accumulation),
- Mechanisms of Force (like the police and the army who are called in to ensure regimes of extraction continue by physically coercing the population if necessary), and
- Ideological Institutions (like the elementary education system, the Catholic church, Hollywood, and the family, tasked with controlling the minds of the exploited populations.
According to Ruyle (1975: pp. 11-12) “These elements of the exploitative system may be institutionalized separately, as in industrial societies such as the United States and the Soviet Union, or they may be integrated into a single unitary institution, as in the early Bronze Age. The precise ensemble of exploitative techniques, together with the manner in which state-church elements are institutionalized, constitutes a historical mode of exploitation.”
Footnotes
- ↑ Sosteric. Rocket Scientists’ Guide to Money and the Economy: Accumulation and Debt. St Albert, Alberta: Lightning Path Press., 2016.
- ↑ Ruyle, Eugene E. “Mode of Production and Mode of Exploitation: The Mechanical and the Dialectical.” Dialectical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (1975): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00244565. p. 11
