Moralizing High God Hypothesis
The Moralizing High God Hypothesis is a hypothesis that suggests that a the Moral High Gods that exist within certain Existential Narratives function to increase cooperation by monitoring and enforcing certain cooperation . [1]
Syncretic Terms
Moralizing High God Hypothesis >
Related LP Terms
Moralizing High God Hypothesis >
Non-LP Related Terms
Moralizing High God Hypothesis > Broad Supernatural Punishment Hypothesis, Moralizing High God
Notes
Traditionally it is thought that MHGs are part of an Existential Narrative folks tell themselves to facilitate cooperation via the threat of horrific punishment, the so called MHG Hypothesis; however, research demonstrates thats MHG follow the development of advanced hierarchical societies. As Watts et. al. say, beliefs like these "follow rather than drive political complexity."[2]. This suggests the rather obvious, that MHG's are used to under pin political and economic hierarchies and authority.
Footnotes
- ↑ Watts, Joseph, Simon J. Greenhill, Quentin D. Atkinson, Thomas E. Currie, Joseph Bulbulia, and Russell D. Gray. “Broad Supernatural Punishment but Not Moralizing High Gods Precede the Evolution of Political Complexity in Austronesia.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, no. 1804 (April 7, 2015): 20142556. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2556.
- ↑ Watts, Joseph, Simon J. Greenhill, Quentin D. Atkinson, Thomas E. Currie, Joseph Bulbulia, and Russell D. Gray. “Broad Supernatural Punishment but Not Moralizing High Gods Precede the Evolution of Political Complexity in Austronesia.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, no. 1804 (April 7, 2015): 20142556. p. 5 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2556.
