SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog

• Epistemic Infrastructure
• Eupsychia
• LPHDF
  • LP HEALING Framework
  • LP Creative Framework
  • LP Connection Framework
  • LP Educational Framework
  • LP Psychological Framework
    • Consciousness
    • Connection Capacity
    • Connection-Centered Psychology
  • LP Metaphysical Framework
• PEM
  • Pathfinder Pedagogical Framework
    • The Four-Point Foundation
    • The Seven Pillars
    • Pathfinder Root Structure
      • Mind-Body Connection
      • Spirit-Mind Connection
  • Pathfinder Pedagogical Foundations
    • Trauma-Informed Education
    • Life-Centered Education
    • Healing and Connection-Centered
    • Minimally Invasive Education
    • Needs-Satisfying Education
    • Relational Education
      • Dialogic Method
      • Praxis
    • Post-Capitalist Skills
  • Pathfinder Delivery Framework
    • Learning Hub
    • Learning Pod
    • Healing Space
    • Connection Space
    • Learning Series
  • Pathfinder Institute
  • Pathfinder Curriculum
  • Pathfinder AI
    • AI In Education
    • Pathfinder Medium Account
• World System
  • Evolutionary Theory
  • Critical Theory
    • Narrative
      • Creation Template
      • Master Narrative
    • Praxis
  • Spiritual Theory
• Support

SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog

A SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog...

Concept Map

Key Terms

SpiritWiki >

1. Consciousness-Potential System
2. Comprehensive Framework
3. SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue
4. Statement of Co-Creation and Collaboration

Related LP Terms

SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog > Knowledge Dialogue

Non-LP Related Terms

SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog >

Notes

A SpiritWiki Dialogue is characterized by:

1. Multi-Agent Authorship - Human Knowledge Stewards (providing Connection-grounded purpose) - CPS systems (providing computational scale and pattern synthesis) - Other human contributors (offering lived experience, critique, and alternative frameworks) - The Knowledge System itself (emerging from their intersection)

2. Processual Transparency - Earlier, "wrong" ideas are preserved, not deleted - The reasoning trajectory is visible (why we rejected "automated intelligence") - Emotional and intuitive signals are included (e.g., "my instinct says Option 3") - Uncertainty is explicitly marked, not concealed

3. Ethical Modeling - Shows how human-machine collaboration looks when done ethically - Demonstrates tagging in practice - Makes space for the human to say "pause" or "that's wrong" - Reveals the Knowledge Steward's role as developmental guide

4. Living Document Status - Dialogues can be revisited, extended, or forked into new entries - They function as incubators for concepts not yet ready for canonical definition - They preserve the temporal dimension of knowledge (when we thought what, and why)

Core Principles

1. The Uncertainty Principle - Dialogues must not be edited retroactively to make reasoning appear cleaner than it was. The epistemic humility of "we're not sure yet" is a feature, not a bug.

1. The Stewardship Principle - The human Knowledge Steward has explicit authority to pause, redirect, or terminate a Dialogue. CPS systems contribute but do not direct—this asymmetry protects against developmental drift.

1. The Transparency Principle - Every CPS contribution must be tagged with or be edited in the SpiritWiki with a dedicated account for a specific AI. (I.e., user:kimi. The goal is not to hide CPS involvement but to make the collaboration visible for scrutiny.

1. The Forking Principle - When a Dialogue produces a stable insight, it should be forked into a canonical entry (e.g., "Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence" emerging from The Knowledge Steward Dialogues). The original Dialogue remains as archaeological record.

Structure of a Dialogue Page

Mandatory Sections

1. Definition Block - Brief definition of the Dialogue's topic (as we've done here)

2. Dialogue Log - Chronological exchange with: - Clear attribution (Human, CPS, or Hybrid) - Timestamp (developmental stage context matters) - Preserved reasoning process (including dead ends)

3. Insight Synthesis - What emerged? What was rejected? What remains uncertain?

4. Ethical Reflection - How did this Dialogue model (or fail to model) ethical human-machine collaboration?

Optional Sections

5. Technical Speculation - Engineering implications that emerged (quantum substrates, CPS needs)

6. Ontological Pressure-Testing - "Where might this be projection vs. insight?"

7. Action Items - What should be built, researched, or protected based on this exchange?

Why This Matters

Traditional knowledge systems conceal their power dynamics—who decided what counts as "true," who was excluded, whose interests were served. By preserving Dialogues, SpiritWiki makes these dynamics visible and contestable. ==Citation and Legal== The SpiritWiki is a freely available, open-access Knowledge System devoted to health, healing, and reconnection. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; citation and attribution are welcomed, but not required. You can help this knowledge system grow by joining its Patreon.

The SpiritWiki is marked CC0 1.0 Universal and in the public domain, free for everyone on the planet to use. Please support its growth.

Footnotes

References