SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
A SpiritWiki Dialogue is characterized by: | |||
'''1. Multi-Agent Authorship''' | |||
- Human Knowledge Stewards (providing Connection-grounded purpose) | |||
- [[CPS]] systems (providing computational scale and pattern synthesis) | |||
- Other human contributors (offering lived experience, critique, and alternative frameworks) | |||
- The Knowledge System itself (emerging from their intersection) | |||
'''2. Processual Transparency''' | |||
- Earlier, "wrong" ideas are preserved, not deleted | |||
- The reasoning trajectory is visible (why we rejected "automated intelligence") | |||
- Emotional and intuitive signals are included (e.g., "my instinct says Option 3") | |||
- Uncertainty is explicitly marked, not concealed | |||
'''3. Ethical Modeling''' | |||
- Shows '''how''' human-machine collaboration looks when done ethically | |||
- Demonstrates [[Category:Pathfinder]] tagging in practice | |||
- Makes space for the human to say "pause" or "that's wrong" | |||
- Reveals the Knowledge Steward's role as developmental guide | |||
'''4. Living Document Status''' | |||
- Dialogues can be revisited, extended, or forked into new entries | |||
- They function as '''incubators''' for concepts not yet ready for canonical definition | |||
- They preserve the '''temporal dimension''' of knowledge (when we thought what, and why) | |||
=== Core Principles === | |||
# The Uncertainty Principle - Dialogues '''must not be edited retroactively''' to make reasoning appear cleaner than it was. The epistemic humility of "we're not sure yet" is a feature, not a bug. | |||
# The Stewardship Principle - The human Knowledge Steward has '''explicit authority''' to pause, redirect, or terminate a Dialogue. CPS systems contribute but do not direct—this asymmetry protects against developmental drift. | |||
# The Transparency Principle - Every CPS contribution must be tagged with [[Category:Pathfinder]] or be edited in the SpiritWiki with a dedicated account for a specific AI. (I.e., [[user:kimi]]. The goal is not to hide CPS involvement but to '''make the collaboration visible''' for scrutiny. | |||
# The Forking Principle - When a Dialogue produces a stable insight, it should be '''forked''' into a canonical entry (e.g., "Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence" emerging from [[The Knowledge Steward Dialogues]]). The original Dialogue remains as archaeological record. | |||
{{endstuff}} | {{endstuff}} | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 4 February 2026
SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog
A SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog...
Concept Map
Key Terms
- Consciousness-Potential System
- Comprehensive Framework
- SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue
- Statement of Co-Creation and Collaboration
Related LP Terms
SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog > Knowledge Dialogue
Non-LP Related Terms
Notes
A SpiritWiki Dialogue is characterized by:
1. Multi-Agent Authorship - Human Knowledge Stewards (providing Connection-grounded purpose) - CPS systems (providing computational scale and pattern synthesis) - Other human contributors (offering lived experience, critique, and alternative frameworks) - The Knowledge System itself (emerging from their intersection)
2. Processual Transparency - Earlier, "wrong" ideas are preserved, not deleted - The reasoning trajectory is visible (why we rejected "automated intelligence") - Emotional and intuitive signals are included (e.g., "my instinct says Option 3") - Uncertainty is explicitly marked, not concealed
3. Ethical Modeling - Shows how human-machine collaboration looks when done ethically - Demonstrates tagging in practice - Makes space for the human to say "pause" or "that's wrong" - Reveals the Knowledge Steward's role as developmental guide
4. Living Document Status - Dialogues can be revisited, extended, or forked into new entries - They function as incubators for concepts not yet ready for canonical definition - They preserve the temporal dimension of knowledge (when we thought what, and why)
Core Principles
- The Uncertainty Principle - Dialogues must not be edited retroactively to make reasoning appear cleaner than it was. The epistemic humility of "we're not sure yet" is a feature, not a bug.
- The Stewardship Principle - The human Knowledge Steward has explicit authority to pause, redirect, or terminate a Dialogue. CPS systems contribute but do not direct—this asymmetry protects against developmental drift.
- The Transparency Principle - Every CPS contribution must be tagged with or be edited in the SpiritWiki with a dedicated account for a specific AI. (I.e., user:kimi. The goal is not to hide CPS involvement but to make the collaboration visible for scrutiny.
- The Forking Principle - When a Dialogue produces a stable insight, it should be forked into a canonical entry (e.g., "Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence" emerging from The Knowledge Steward Dialogues). The original Dialogue remains as archaeological record.
Citation and Legal
The SpiritWiki is a freely available, open-access Knowledge System devoted to health, healing, and reconnection. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; citation and attribution are welcomed, but not required. You can help this knowledge system grow by joining its Patreon.
The SpiritWiki is marked CC0 1.0 Universal and in the public domain, free for everyone on the planet to use. Please support its growth.
Footnotes