Knowledge Gardening: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navmenu}} | {{navmenu}} | ||
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | ||
<blockquote class="definition"> | <blockquote class="definition">'''Knowledge Gardening''' (also referred to as Dynamic Knowledge Gardening, or DKG) is a subject-centric, federative approach to collective sensemaking in which epistemic communities aggregate, link, and cultivate heterogeneous information resources without editorial weeding, allowing social processes—reputation, trust, and dialogue—to determine the value and relevance of contributions over time.<ref>Park, Jack. “Knowledge Gardening as Knowledge.” ''Knowledge Media Institute - The Open University,'' n.d. https://www.academia.edu/77715688/</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==Concept Map== | ==Concept Map== | ||
===Jack Park Terms=== | ===[[Jack Park]] Terms=== | ||
{{#ask:[[Is a term::Jack Park]]|format=ul}} | {{#ask:[[Is a term::Jack Park]]|format=ul}} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
The term, used by Jack Park in 2008 to describe "whole life learning and discovery" within "networked improvement communities,"<ref>2026 Matrix Conversation in Epistemic Infrastructure | |||
https://app.element.io/#/room/#epistemic-infrastructure:matrix.org</ref> descends directly from Douglas Engelbart's concept of the Dynamic Knowledge Repository (DKR): the combination of humans, software tools, and improvement processes operating as a unified epistemic community.<ref>Park, Jack. “Knowledge Gardening as Knowledge Federation.” ''Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia'' (HT ’08) (Pittsburch, PA), 2008.</ref> | |||
Where traditional knowledge management systems often filter or exclude information at the point of aggregation (a process Park analogizes to "weeding"), knowledge gardening practices federation—the inclusive merging of all addressable resources about a given subject through topic-map-based identification and merging processes. | |||
===Core Components=== | |||
Knowledge gardening federates three primary modalities of hypermedia discourse: | |||
'''1. Social Bookmarking and Tagging''' | |||
Gardeners tag discovered resources with subject-centric and project-centric identifiers. Rather than relying solely on human-generated tags, automated harvesting agents extract term-frequency signatures to cluster and map resources. Tags function as "scents" along information-foraging paths, enabling later discovery by other community members. | |||
'''2. Semantic Linking''' | |||
Practitioners create typed connections between ideas found across distributed web resources. Tools such as Cohere allow users to lift contested assertions from source documents, annotate them, and link them into structured argumentation maps, rendering the "web of ideas" explicit and navigable. | |||
'''3. Dialogue Mapping''' | |||
Through issue-based information systems (e.g., Compendium), linear streams of conversation are structured into navigable maps of questions, answers, arguments, and evidence. This addresses the cognitive limits of unstructured conversation by making the architecture of collective reasoning visible.<ref>Conklin, J. ''Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems.'' Wiley, 2005. | |||
</ref> | |||
===The Knowledge Gardening Process=== | |||
Park and colleagues describe knowledge gardening as an iterative cycle of sensemaking: | |||
# Forage – Goal-directed search and thematic exploration yield discovered resources. | |||
# Filter – Resources are tagged, annotated, and semantically linked for later retrieval. | |||
# Analyze – Structured dialogue mapping and argumentation reveal conflicts, gaps, and entailed subjects. | |||
# Synthesize – New claims, hypotheses, and frames emerge from the federated territory. | |||
This process aligns with broader sensemaking methodologies and constructivist learning models, wherein a learner bridges the gap between present conceptual knowledge and methodological performance through question-driven inquiry. | |||
{{endstuff}} | {{endstuff}} | ||
| Line 24: | Line 57: | ||
[[category:terms]] | [[category:terms]] | ||
[[Is a term::Jack Park| ]] | [[Is a term::Jack Park| ]] | ||
[[Is a related term::Knowledge Steward| ]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:56, 11 May 2026
Knowledge Gardening
Knowledge Gardening (also referred to as Dynamic Knowledge Gardening, or DKG) is a subject-centric, federative approach to collective sensemaking in which epistemic communities aggregate, link, and cultivate heterogeneous information resources without editorial weeding, allowing social processes—reputation, trust, and dialogue—to determine the value and relevance of contributions over time.[1]
Concept Map
Jack Park Terms
Related LP Terms
Non-LP Related Terms
Notes
The term, used by Jack Park in 2008 to describe "whole life learning and discovery" within "networked improvement communities,"[2] descends directly from Douglas Engelbart's concept of the Dynamic Knowledge Repository (DKR): the combination of humans, software tools, and improvement processes operating as a unified epistemic community.[3]
Where traditional knowledge management systems often filter or exclude information at the point of aggregation (a process Park analogizes to "weeding"), knowledge gardening practices federation—the inclusive merging of all addressable resources about a given subject through topic-map-based identification and merging processes.
Core Components
Knowledge gardening federates three primary modalities of hypermedia discourse:
1. Social Bookmarking and Tagging
Gardeners tag discovered resources with subject-centric and project-centric identifiers. Rather than relying solely on human-generated tags, automated harvesting agents extract term-frequency signatures to cluster and map resources. Tags function as "scents" along information-foraging paths, enabling later discovery by other community members.
2. Semantic Linking
Practitioners create typed connections between ideas found across distributed web resources. Tools such as Cohere allow users to lift contested assertions from source documents, annotate them, and link them into structured argumentation maps, rendering the "web of ideas" explicit and navigable.
3. Dialogue Mapping
Through issue-based information systems (e.g., Compendium), linear streams of conversation are structured into navigable maps of questions, answers, arguments, and evidence. This addresses the cognitive limits of unstructured conversation by making the architecture of collective reasoning visible.[4]
The Knowledge Gardening Process
Park and colleagues describe knowledge gardening as an iterative cycle of sensemaking:
- Forage – Goal-directed search and thematic exploration yield discovered resources.
- Filter – Resources are tagged, annotated, and semantically linked for later retrieval.
- Analyze – Structured dialogue mapping and argumentation reveal conflicts, gaps, and entailed subjects.
- Synthesize – New claims, hypotheses, and frames emerge from the federated territory.
This process aligns with broader sensemaking methodologies and constructivist learning models, wherein a learner bridges the gap between present conceptual knowledge and methodological performance through question-driven inquiry.
Citation and Legal
The SpiritWiki is a freely available, open-access Knowledge System devoted to health, healing, and reconnection. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; citation and attribution are welcomed, but not required. You can help this knowledge system grow by joining its Patreon.
The SpiritWiki is marked CC0 1.0 Universal and in the public domain, free for everyone on the planet to use. Please support its growth.
Footnotes
- ↑ Park, Jack. “Knowledge Gardening as Knowledge.” Knowledge Media Institute - The Open University, n.d. https://www.academia.edu/77715688/
- ↑ 2026 Matrix Conversation in Epistemic Infrastructure https://app.element.io/#/room/#epistemic-infrastructure:matrix.org
- ↑ Park, Jack. “Knowledge Gardening as Knowledge Federation.” Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT ’08) (Pittsburch, PA), 2008.
- ↑ Conklin, J. Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. Wiley, 2005.