Difference between revisions of "Archetype Deck"
m (Text replacement - "{{template:cite}}" to "{{template:cite}} {{template:references}}") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An '''Archetype Deck''' | <blockquote class="definition"> | ||
An '''Archetype Deck''' is a collection of [[archetypes]] presented as images. Archetype decks are typically accompanied by descriptions of the archetypes designed to help insert/implant them into an individual's consciousness. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
=Related Terms== | |||
[[Archetype Deck]]> {{#ask:[[Is a related term::Archetype Deck]]}} | |||
==Syncretic Terms== | |||
[[Connection Appliance]] > {{#ask:[[Is a syncretic term::Connection Appliance]]}} | |||
==List of Connection Appliances== | |||
[[Connection Appliances]] > {{#ask:[[Is a::Connection Appliance]]}} | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Tarot decks are examples of archetypes decks | For more on archetypes, see the article "A Short Sociology of Archetypes."<ref>Sosteric, Mike. “A Short Sociology of Archetypes,” 2020. https://www.academia.edu/44254363/.</ref> | ||
Tarot decks, which were created by [[Freemasons]] for the propaganda purposes<ref>Sosteric, Mike. “A Sociology of Tarot.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 39, no. 3 (2014).</ref> are examples of archetypes decks. | |||
Archetype decks can be broken down into two separate categories, [[Old Energy]] archetype decks, and [[New Energy]] archetype decks. | Archetype decks can be broken down into two separate categories, [[Old Energy]] archetype decks, and [[New Energy]] archetype decks. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 25: | ||
Old energy archetype decks may be identified by the presence of The Fool, Judgment, and Devil archetypes. | Old energy archetype decks may be identified by the presence of The Fool, Judgment, and Devil archetypes. | ||
New energy archetype decks may be identified by the absence said archetypes and the presence of [[The Calling], [[Joyful]], and [[The Universe]] archetypes, to name just a few. | New energy archetype decks may be identified by the absence of said archetypes and the presence of [[The Calling], [[Joyful]], and [[The Universe]] archetypes, to name just a few. | ||
{{courses}} | |||
{{lp260}} | |||
{{ | {{lp270}} | ||
{{ | {{lp280}} | ||
{{ | {{endstuff}} | ||
[[category:terms]] | [[category:terms]] | ||
[[category:lightningpath]] | [[category:lightningpath]] | ||
[[category:BOTHA]] | [[category:BOTHA]] | ||
[[category:BOT]] | [[category:BOT]][[Is a related term::Triumph of Spirit Archetype System| ]][[Is a::Connection Appliance| ]] | ||
Revision as of 03:04, 18 October 2022
An Archetype Deck is a collection of archetypes presented as images. Archetype decks are typically accompanied by descriptions of the archetypes designed to help insert/implant them into an individual's consciousness.
Related Terms=
Archetype Deck> Archetype Cards
Syncretic Terms
Connection Appliance > Technologies of the Sacred
List of Connection Appliances
Connection Appliances > Archetype Cards, Archetype Deck, Bible, Drums, Guardian Boards, Quartz Crystals, Sacred Pipe, Sacred Stones, Spirit Lodge, Tibetan Singing Bowls, Triumph of Spirit Archetype Deck, Triumph of Spirit Archetype System
Notes
For more on archetypes, see the article "A Short Sociology of Archetypes."[1]
Tarot decks, which were created by Freemasons for the propaganda purposes[2] are examples of archetypes decks.
Archetype decks can be broken down into two separate categories, Old Energy archetype decks, and New Energy archetype decks.
Old energy archetype decks may be identified by the presence of The Fool, Judgment, and Devil archetypes.
New energy archetype decks may be identified by the absence of said archetypes and the presence of [[The Calling], Joyful, and The Universe archetypes, to name just a few.
Related LP Courses
- LP 280 - The Triumph of Spirit Archetype System (teaches you all about the Lightning Path's Triumph of Spirit Archetype System and its archetypes
Footnotes
- ↑ Sosteric, Mike. “A Short Sociology of Archetypes,” 2020. https://www.academia.edu/44254363/.
- ↑ Sosteric, Mike. “A Sociology of Tarot.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 39, no. 3 (2014).
