Talk:Space-Time Tube

The Spacetime has been mathematically described by Minkowski and was a necessary step to explain/understand the postulates of Special Relativity. See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space--Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Entanglement of Dimensions

It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted one after the other , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads. --Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Correlation to Justice

There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. Although this seems odd at first sight, but a look at the functional purposes of the dimensions shows that it's not that far of a fetch: As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of parallelism, time and space all solve the problem of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same priority concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another. The solution to this problem works via dimensions: Parallelism, time, space. The dimension of parallelism is very similar to those of time and space. All three dimensions create what might be called "order" , or simultaneous realization of conflicting (which is to say not identical) wishes.(I have to say that i'm always amazed by the heuristic abilities of spirit..) --Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Time

The dimension of time solves the problem by the creation of temporal "distance". The realization of two conflicting wishes is done one after the other. The duration for one wish to be instantiated depends on the discrepancy between said wish and the wish of other monads "in the vicinity". This dimension creates a temporal order. --Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Space

The dimension of space solves the problem by the creation of spacial distance. The realization of two conflicting wishes is done one next to each other. The spatial distance from one wish to another depends on the discrepancy between said wish and those of other monads "in the vicinity". This dimension creates a spatial order.--Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

1FV vs 3FV

It is helpfull to differentiate between the fundamental views of creation. It is more accurate (and possibly simpler) to try to grasp the underlying characteristica of the dimensions from the perspective of the first fundamental view of creation.

1FV - 3FV

potential distance - chance among alternatives

temporal distance - point in time

spatial distance - location in space

In 3FV perspective, we experience the dimensions as one alternative at one point in time in one location in space.

Definition of Justice

tentative definition of Justice: Justice is the system that enables the instantiation of incompatible wishes of different monads as sure (minimizing chance), as fast (minimizing duration) , and as spatially imidiate (minimizing space) as possible.

tentative description of Justice via a formula: for the wish of a given Monad given a certain distribution of wishes of other monads:

imidiateness of a wish = wish of the given monad - discrepancy of the wishes of other monads.

if the right side of the equation is negative, time, space and chance must be applied.

Note: If the discrepancy of the wishes of the other monads goes near 0, the wish of the monad is manifested quickly because the imidiateness of the wish equals the respective wish. The more monads wish the same thing, the faster it is instantiated. The lower the discrepancy, the fast it is possible for the respective wishes to instantiate.--Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)