Emotional Energy: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
Created page with "{{navmenu}} <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> <blockquote class="definition">'''Emotional Energy''' (EE) is, in Randall Collins's interaction ritual theory, the short and long-term motivational byproduct of successful rituals: the "social emotion par excellence" that makes "the individual participant feel strong, confident, full of impulses to take the initiative." Part of the collective effervescence of a highly focused, emotionally entrained interaction "is..." |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navmenu}} | {{navmenu}} | ||
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | ||
<blockquote class="definition">'''Emotional Energy''' (EE) is, in Randall Collins's interaction ritual theory, the short and long-term motivational byproduct of successful rituals: the "social emotion par excellence" that makes "the individual participant feel strong, confident, full of impulses to take the initiative." Part of the collective effervescence of a highly focused, emotionally entrained interaction "is apportioned to the individuals, who come away from the situation carrying the group-aroused emotion for a time in their bodies." EE energizes human thought and action, operates as the common denominator of all motivation, and stratifies individuals as it flows across situations.<ref>Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), xii, 102–7.</ref> In the Lightning Path framework, EE is the circulating resource whose production, direction, and appropriation are tracked under [[Ritual]], [[Collective Effervescence]], [[Raising Power]], and [[The Harvest]].</blockquote> | <blockquote class="definition">'''Emotional Energy''' (EE) is, in Randall Collins's interaction ritual theory, the short and long-term motivational byproduct of successful rituals: the "social emotion par excellence" that makes, after Durkheim, "the individual participant feel strong, confident, full of impulses to take the initiative." Part of the collective effervescence of a highly focused, emotionally entrained interaction "is apportioned to the individuals, who come away from the situation carrying the group-aroused emotion for a time in their bodies." EE energizes human thought and action, operates as the common denominator of all motivation, and stratifies individuals as it flows across situations.<ref>Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), xii, 102–7.</ref> In the Lightning Path framework, EE is the circulating resource whose production, direction, and appropriation are tracked under [[Ritual]], [[Collective Effervescence]], [[Raising Power]], and [[The Harvest]].</blockquote> | ||
==Concept Map== | ==Concept Map== | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
==Quotes== | ==Quotes== | ||
<blockquote>"Privilege and power is not simply a result of unequal material and cultural resources. It is a flow of emotional energy across situations that makes some individuals more impressive, more attractive or dominant; the same situational flow puts other persons in their shadow, narrowing their sources of EE to the alternatives of participating as followers or being relegated passively to the sidelines. Social dominance—whether it takes the form of leadership, popularity, intellectual innovativeness, or physical aggressiveness—is often acceded to by others who encounter such a person, because it occurs through emotional processes that pump some individuals up while depressing others.<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xiii.</ref></blockquote>The following are Durkheim quoted in Collins and require verification<blockquote>The man who has obeyed his god and who for this reason, believes the god is with him, approaches the world with confidence and with the feeling of increased energy . . . . since society cannot exist except in and through individual consciousness, this force must also penetrate us and organize itself within us; it thus becomes an integral part of our being and by that very fact this [our being] is elevated and magnified. (Durkheim 1912/1965, 242). | |||
The man who has obeyed his god and who for this reason, believes the god is with him, approaches the world with confidence and with the feeling of increased energy . . . . since society cannot exist except in and through individual consciousness, this force must also penetrate us and organize itself within us; it thus becomes an integral part of our being and by that very fact this [our being] is elevated and magnified. (Durkheim 1912/1965, 242)</blockquote>A fundamental human motive is the "seeking maximal emotional energy in [[Interaction Rituals]]."<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xiii.</ref> | |||
There is a "propensity of individuals to drift, consciously or unconsciously, towards those situations where there is the greatest payoff of benefits over costs."<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xiii.</ref><blockquote>"EE-seeking is the master motive across all institutional arenas"<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xv.</ref></blockquote>Everything is motivated by EE-seeking. | |||
There is a "propensity of individuals to drift, consciously or unconsciously, towards those situations where there is the greatest payoff of benefits over costs."<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xiii.</ref> | |||
"EE-seeking is the master motive across all institutional arenas"<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xv.</ref> | |||
Everything is motivated by EE-seeking. | |||
"IRs charge up ideas with varying degrees of membership significance by marking them with differing amounts of [[EE]]. Some ideas are therefore easier to think with than others....such ideas spring to the mind, or flow trippingly on the tongue, whereas other ideas are less attracted into the interaction, or even excluded from it by a tacit social barrier "<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xv-xvi.</ref> | "IRs charge up ideas with varying degrees of membership significance by marking them with differing amounts of [[EE]]. Some ideas are therefore easier to think with than others....such ideas spring to the mind, or flow trippingly on the tongue, whereas other ideas are less attracted into the interaction, or even excluded from it by a tacit social barrier "<ref>Randall Collins, ''Interaction Ritual Chains'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xv-xvi.</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:46, 12 October 2026
Emotional Energy
Emotional Energy (EE) is, in Randall Collins's interaction ritual theory, the short and long-term motivational byproduct of successful rituals: the "social emotion par excellence" that makes, after Durkheim, "the individual participant feel strong, confident, full of impulses to take the initiative." Part of the collective effervescence of a highly focused, emotionally entrained interaction "is apportioned to the individuals, who come away from the situation carrying the group-aroused emotion for a time in their bodies." EE energizes human thought and action, operates as the common denominator of all motivation, and stratifies individuals as it flows across situations.[1] In the Lightning Path framework, EE is the circulating resource whose production, direction, and appropriation are tracked under Ritual, Collective Effervescence, Raising Power, and The Harvest.
Concept Map
Key Terms
Ritual >
- Collective Effervescence
- Consecration
- Exchange Ritual
- Governance Ritual
- Identity Ritual
- Interaction Ritual
- The Harvest
Syncretic Terms
Related LP Terms
Non-LP Related Terms
Notes
A Sociological Concept with Esoteric Neighbors
EE flirts constantly with the vocabularies it displaced. The New Age frame treats energy as a free-moving commodity circulating through human existence — "the energy we talk about in Witchcraft is real, a subtle force that we can all learn to perceive," raised through chanting or dancing, contained in circles, stored and discharged at will, flowing in spirals through persons, groups, and the cosmos.[2] The esoteric frame is darker: energy is power, defined as the capacity to manipulate and redirect the energy of others. In the Golden Dawn system the lodge officers "visualize and empower various symbols and correspondences, invoke the associated spiritual forces, manipulate the currents of the Astral Light, and use the faculties of willpower, visualization, and imagination to give the ceremony its magical potency"; consecrated telesma store charge for indefinite periods; and a "strong person can galvanise a weak one," though the effect is "only a temporary folly" unless the weak one does the work.[3] Collins's achievement is to translate this esoteric thermodynamics into an operational sociology — EE is measurable, stratified, and market-like — while retaining, almost verbatim, the metaphors of raising, lowering, draining, charging, and storage.
EE as the Fuel of Thought and Action
EE is the energy supply for human thought and action, and it is a scarce and valuable resource. "EE-seeking is the master motive across all institutional arenas"; individuals drift toward situations promising the highest EE payoff, and "what we think of as 'social embedding' is in fact in the center of economic action," since successful rituals produce the moral solidarity that economic sociologists call trust.[4] An interaction ritual "is an emotion transformer, taking some emotions as ingredients, and turning them into other emotions as outcomes" — and the durable output is EE, which carries "its hidden resonance of group membership" into subsequent situations along the chain.[5]
Raising and Lowering
EE can be raised and lowered, and the interaction ritual is the site where this happens. EE is raised by: successful rituals with high bodily co-presence, mutual focus, shared mood, and barriers to outsiders; power rituals — giving orders raises the EE of the dominant and drains the subordinate; and status rituals — acceptance raises EE, rejection lowers it. EE is lowered by: failed, empty, or forced rituals; being "emotionally battered by someone else's interaction ritual that does not allow one inside"; and the stratification of interaction itself, since interacting with people higher or lower in power, and from positions of status acceptance or rejection, "gives each individual a jolt, upward or downward, to their level of EE."[6] "Social structure, viewed up close as a chain of interactional situations, is an ongoing process of stratifying individuals by their emotional energy."[7]
Examples: Generating and Suppressing
Collins's cases show the mechanism at both poles. Generation: the ritualized pile-on of championship sports teams; the conversational turn-taking that builds rhythmic entrainment; the street crowds of 9/11, where shared focus created new national symbols in real time.[8] Suppression: the failed meeting where mutual focus never ignites; the forced ritual performed under compulsion; the employee on the receiving end of the supervisor's dominance ritual, whose EE is quietly taxed every time the ritual is enacted; the outsider whose exclusion from the group's ritual is itself an interaction ritual on the other side of the boundary.[9]
Direction: Positive and Negative
Once energy is generated, it requires a direction. Interaction rituals can supply this — the shared mood and mutual focus channel EE toward the ritual's object — but so can the other ritual types: identity rituals direct it toward belonging, governance rituals toward authority, and exchange rituals toward obligation. The direction can be positive. A radio control airplane club, for instance, raises the EE of its members — the excitement of flight, the pride of craftsmanship, the solidarity of shared hobby — and directs it toward events, meetings, teaching newcomers, and building the club. The direction can also be negative. The Nazi rally deployed precisely the same ingredients — symbols, rhetoric, drama, uniformed bodies in rhythmic assembly under firelight — to raise energy and aim it at hatred and violence.
Who raises the energy, who aims it, and who benefits is the question pursued under The Harvest.
EE in the Action System
EE also belongs inside Parsons's framing of human motivation. Ritual is a human activity situated in the general action system — the realm of meaning, symbols, norms, and culture — and it draws on all of these even as it helps create them: rituals use inherited symbols and moral norms as ingredients, and their successful performance regenerates the symbol stock, internalizes norms in personalities, and produces the solidarity that makes further action possible. Parsons's late work, placing "the general system of action in a still broader setting, that which we have called the 'human condition,'" supplies the frame within which ritual motivation can be analyzed as simultaneously cultural, social, psychological, and — at the boundary of the action system — connected to what he called the telic realm.[10] Collins radicalizes this insight by relocating the motor: where Parsons mapped the system's structure, Collins identifies the micro-engine — ritual — that charges its participants with the emotional energy the system runs on. See also Collective Effervescence, Raising Power, and The Harvest.
Quotes
"Privilege and power is not simply a result of unequal material and cultural resources. It is a flow of emotional energy across situations that makes some individuals more impressive, more attractive or dominant; the same situational flow puts other persons in their shadow, narrowing their sources of EE to the alternatives of participating as followers or being relegated passively to the sidelines. Social dominance—whether it takes the form of leadership, popularity, intellectual innovativeness, or physical aggressiveness—is often acceded to by others who encounter such a person, because it occurs through emotional processes that pump some individuals up while depressing others.[11]
The following are Durkheim quoted in Collins and require verification
The man who has obeyed his god and who for this reason, believes the god is with him, approaches the world with confidence and with the feeling of increased energy . . . . since society cannot exist except in and through individual consciousness, this force must also penetrate us and organize itself within us; it thus becomes an integral part of our being and by that very fact this [our being] is elevated and magnified. (Durkheim 1912/1965, 242). The man who has obeyed his god and who for this reason, believes the god is with him, approaches the world with confidence and with the feeling of increased energy . . . . since society cannot exist except in and through individual consciousness, this force must also penetrate us and organize itself within us; it thus becomes an integral part of our being and by that very fact this [our being] is elevated and magnified. (Durkheim 1912/1965, 242)
A fundamental human motive is the "seeking maximal emotional energy in Interaction Rituals."[12] There is a "propensity of individuals to drift, consciously or unconsciously, towards those situations where there is the greatest payoff of benefits over costs."[13]
"EE-seeking is the master motive across all institutional arenas"[14]
Everything is motivated by EE-seeking.
"IRs charge up ideas with varying degrees of membership significance by marking them with differing amounts of EE. Some ideas are therefore easier to think with than others....such ideas spring to the mind, or flow trippingly on the tongue, whereas other ideas are less attracted into the interaction, or even excluded from it by a tacit social barrier "[15]
Citation and Legal
The SpiritWiki is a freely available, open-access Knowledge System devoted to health, healing, and reconnection. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; citation and attribution are welcomed, but not required. You can help this knowledge system grow by joining its Patreon.
The SpiritWiki is marked CC0 1.0 Universal and in the public domain, free for everyone on the planet to use. Please support its growth.
Footnotes
- ↑ Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), xii, 102–7.
- ↑ Starhawk, The Spiral Dance: A Rebirth of the Ancient Religion of the Great Goddess, 20th anniversary ed. (New York: HarperOne, 1999), 38, 67, 83, 154–60.
- ↑ Chic Cicero and Sandra Tabatha Cicero, preface to The Golden Dawn: The Original Account of the Teachings, Rites, and Ceremonies of the Hermetic Order, by Israel Regardie, 7th ed. (Woodbury, MN: Llewellyn, 2015), 17; S. L. MacGregor Mathers et al., "Flying Roll No. XI: Clairvoyance," in Astral Projection, Ritual Magic, and Alchemy: Golden Dawn Material, ed. Francis King (Rochester, VT: Destiny Books, 1987), 77–78, 81.
- ↑ Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains, xv. See also ch. 4, "Emotional Energy as the Common Denominator of Rational Choice."
- ↑ Ibid., xii–xiii.
- ↑ Ibid., xii–xiii, 50, 107–21, 131–33; on measurement, see the appendix, "Measuring Emotional Energy and Its Antecents," 133–40.
- ↑ Ibid., xiii.
- ↑ Ibid., 56–58, 66–81, 88–95.
- ↑ Ibid., xii–xiii, 50, 112–15.
- ↑ Talcott Parsons, Action Theory and the Human Condition (New York: Free Press, 1978), 1, 5–7; on the internalization of moral norms and the internal environment of action, ibid., 7.
- ↑ Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xiii.
- ↑ Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xiii.
- ↑ Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xiii.
- ↑ Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xv.
- ↑ Randall Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). p. xv-xvi.
