|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{navmenu}}
| | #REDIRECT [[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue]] |
| <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>
| |
| <blockquote class="definition">
| |
| A '''SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog'''...
| |
| | |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| ==Concept Map==
| |
| | |
| ===Key Terms===
| |
| | |
| [[SpiritWiki]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::SpiritWiki]]|format=ol|sort=Has sort SW}}
| |
| | |
| ===Related LP Terms===
| |
| [[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related LP term::SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]]}}
| |
| | |
| ===Non-LP Related Terms===
| |
| [[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related term::SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]]}}
| |
| | |
| ==Notes==
| |
| | |
| | |
| A SpiritWiki Dialogue is characterized by:
| |
| | |
| '''1. Multi-Agent Authorship'''
| |
| - Human Knowledge Stewards (providing Connection-grounded purpose)
| |
| - [[CPS]] systems (providing computational scale and pattern synthesis)
| |
| - Other human contributors (offering lived experience, critique, and alternative frameworks)
| |
| - The Knowledge System itself (emerging from their intersection)
| |
| | |
| '''2. Processual Transparency'''
| |
| - Earlier, "wrong" ideas are preserved, not deleted
| |
| - The reasoning trajectory is visible (why we rejected "automated intelligence")
| |
| - Emotional and intuitive signals are included (e.g., "my instinct says Option 3")
| |
| - Uncertainty is explicitly marked, not concealed
| |
| | |
| '''3. Ethical Modeling'''
| |
| - Shows '''how''' human-machine collaboration looks when done ethically
| |
| - Demonstrates [[Category:Pathfinder]] tagging in practice
| |
| - Makes space for the human to say "pause" or "that's wrong"
| |
| - Reveals the Knowledge Steward's role as developmental guide
| |
| | |
| '''4. Living Document Status'''
| |
| - Dialogues can be revisited, extended, or forked into new entries
| |
| - They function as '''incubators''' for concepts not yet ready for canonical definition
| |
| - They preserve the '''temporal dimension''' of knowledge (when we thought what, and why)
| |
| | |
| === Core Principles ===
| |
| | |
| # The Uncertainty Principle - Dialogues '''must not be edited retroactively''' to make reasoning appear cleaner than it was. The epistemic humility of "we're not sure yet" is a feature, not a bug.
| |
| | |
| # The Stewardship Principle - The human Knowledge Steward has '''explicit authority''' to pause, redirect, or terminate a Dialogue. CPS systems contribute but do not direct—this asymmetry protects against developmental drift.
| |
| | |
| # The Transparency Principle - Every CPS contribution must be tagged with [[Category:Pathfinder]] or be edited in the SpiritWiki with a dedicated account for a specific AI. (I.e., [[user:kimi]]. The goal is not to hide CPS involvement but to '''make the collaboration visible''' for scrutiny.
| |
| | |
| # The Forking Principle - When a Dialogue produces a stable insight, it should be '''forked''' into a canonical entry (e.g., "Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence" emerging from [[The Knowledge Steward Dialogues]]). The original Dialogue remains as archaeological record. | |
| | |
| === Structure of a Dialogue Page ===
| |
| | |
| ==== Mandatory Sections ====
| |
| '''1. Definition Block''' - Brief definition of the Dialogue's topic (as we've done here)
| |
| | |
| '''2. Dialogue Log''' - Chronological exchange with: - Clear attribution (Human, CPS, or Hybrid) - Timestamp (developmental stage context matters) - Preserved reasoning process (including dead ends)
| |
| | |
| '''3. Insight Synthesis''' - What emerged? What was rejected? What remains uncertain?
| |
| | |
| '''4. Ethical Reflection''' - How did this Dialogue model (or fail to model) ethical human-machine collaboration?
| |
| | |
| ==== Optional Sections ====
| |
| '''5. Technical Speculation''' - Engineering implications that emerged (quantum substrates, CPS needs)
| |
| | |
| '''6. Ontological Pressure-Testing''' - "Where might this be projection vs. insight?"
| |
| | |
| '''7. Action Items''' - What should be built, researched, or protected based on this exchange?
| |
| | |
| ==== Why This Matters ====
| |
| Traditional knowledge systems '''conceal their power dynamics'''—who decided what counts as "true," who was excluded, whose interests were served. By preserving Dialogues, SpiritWiki makes these dynamics '''visible and contestable'''. {{endstuff}}
| |
| | |
| [[category:terms]]
| |
| [[category:pathfinder]]
| |
| [[Is a key term::SpiritWiki| ]] | |
| [[Has sort SW::4.1| ]]
| |
| [[Is a related term::Knowledge Dialogue| ]]
| |
