Actions

Gonennoncwal: Difference between revisions

An Avatar.Global Resource

Text replacement - "'''Exogenous to the LP''' \[\[(.*)\]\] > {{#ask:\[\[Is a related term::.*\]\]}}" to "==Non-LP Related Terms== $1 > {{#ask:Is a related term::$1}}"
Text replacement - "]]" to " [["
Line 28: Line 28:
{{endstuff}}
{{endstuff}}


[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Is a related term::Huron| ]][[Is a syncretic term::Alignment| ]]
[[category:terms]]
[[category:lightningpath]]
[[Is a related term::Huron| ]]
[[Is a syncretic term::Alignment| ]]

Revision as of 07:04, 19 December 2022

Gonennoncwal

For the Huron, Gonennoncwal represents the attraction of a particular soul to crtain objects which embody a manifestation of its needs." [1]

Related LP Terms

Non-LP Related Terms

Syncretic Terms

Indigenous Spiritualities

Notes

Recognition of Khiondhecwi and Ondinoc led to " health and well-being but the inhibition of that need could lead to illness and possibly death." [2]

Note, the community got together to help satisfy the individuals needs and desires. "In the broader context, the ondinoc of the individual would be announced to the entire village by a chief and all of its members would attempt, as soon as possible, to provide the necessary goods and actions that would lead to the dreamers satisfaction (JR 17:155; Sagard 1939:118). In this way, dreaming functioned dynamically as a religiously motivated basis for processes of social integration and interaction."[3]

Citation and Legal

Treat the SpiritWiki as an open-access online monograph or structured textbook. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; however, attribution, citation, and/or direct linking are ethically required.

Footnotes

  1. Irwin, Lee. “The Huron-Jesuit Relations: Contesting Dreams, Confirming Worldviews.” Religion 22 (1992): 259–70.
  2. Irwin, Lee. “The Huron-Jesuit Relations: Contesting Dreams, Confirming Worldviews.” Religion 22 (1992): 259–70.
  3. Irwin, Lee. “The Huron-Jesuit Relations: Contesting Dreams, Confirming Worldviews.” Religion 22 (1992): 259–70.