Actions

Circle of Self: Difference between revisions

An Avatar.Global Resource

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
=== Propositional Notes on the Circle of Self ===


One might be tempted to insert "environment" into the equation here, and an argument could be made. If you're
# At the beginning of life, only the '''Material Context of Self''' exists: the physical body (instincts, reflexes, needs), the natural environment, and the built environment (homes, roads, stores, bridges, schools) into which the body is born. The bodily ego develops ''after'' this, not before it
# The self is '''embedded''' in a complex social network. There is no self outside of relations. The self develops as a consequence of the totality of its relations, the environment those relations provide, and their influence and actions upon it.
# The self is formed through relations that unfold in a roughly '''temporal sequence''': [[Primary Caregivers]] → [[Family (Extended)]] → [[Community]] → [[Friends]] → [[Leisure Relations]] → [[School Relations]] → [[Work Relations]]. Earlier relations provide the foundation upon which later relations act.
# The self is motivated by two intersecting forces: a '''biologically rooted push''' (instincts, reflexes, needs) and a '''culturally rooted pull''' (the norms, values, aspirations, symbols, narratives, art, and music a culture deploys). This is the '''[[Motivational Context of Self]]'''.
# Environment — natural and built — provides an '''[[Enabling Context]]'''. The environment simultaneously limits and enables. It sets the boundaries of what the self can experience and do (the limiting function) while making certain developmental outcomes, choices, and ways of being possible in the first place (the enabling function). No capacity, aspiration, or behavior can emerge from a context that does not support it.
# The self can only '''choose from what is made available to it'''. This is the question of '''Availability of Choice'''. Choice is never unconstrained: the options a self perceives and selects from are drawn from the material, relational, and cultural contexts surrounding it. This raises political, economic, and sociological questions about ''what is made available, what is withheld, and who decides''.
# Because the self is relationally formed, '''harm within any circle of relation''' (family violence, community exclusion, toxic workplaces, oppressive cultures, in a word [[Toxic Socialization]]) leads to withdrawal, boundary formation, and [[disconnection]] — protective responses that may persist long after the original threat has passed.
# The Circle of Self is therefore not merely a psychological model but an '''interdisciplinary one''':
#* '''Psychology''' contributes attachment theory, developmental stages, and the mechanics of ego formation.
#* '''Sociology''' contributes socialization theory, social structure, and the analysis of institutions (family, school, work).
#* '''Anthropology''' contributes culture, symbolism, ritual, and comparative accounts of how selves are made differently across societies.
#* '''History''' contributes the long view: what has been made available to selves has changed across epochs, and so has what selves can become.
#* '''Economics and political science''' contribute the analysis of what the environment provides and withholds, and whose interests shape the availability of options.
# The Circle of Self is a '''[[Sphere of Socialization]]''' viewed from the inside out: each ring is simultaneously a source of nurture and a potential source of harm, and the health of the self is inseparable from the health of all its circles.
# Environment — natural and built — provides an '''Enabling Context'''. The environment simultaneously limits and enables. It sets the boundaries of what the self can experience and do (the limiting function) while making certain developmental outcomes, choices, and ways of being possible in the first place (the enabling function). No capacity, aspiration, or behavior can emerge from a context that does not support it.
# The self can only '''choose from what is made available to it'''. This is the question of '''Availability of Choice'''. Choice is never unconstrained: the options a self perceives and selects from are drawn from the material, relational, and cultural contexts surrounding it. This raises political, economic, and sociological questions about ''what is made available, what is withheld, and who decides''.
# Because the self is relationally formed, '''harm within any circle of relation''' (family violence, community exclusion, toxic workplaces, oppressive cultures) leads to withdrawal, boundary formation, and disconnection — protective responses that may persist long after the original threat has passed.
# The Circle of Self is therefore not merely a psychological model but an '''interdisciplinary one''':
#* '''Psychology''' contributes attachment theory, developmental stages, needs theory, and the mechanics of ego formation.
#* '''Sociology''' contributes socialization theory, social structure, and the analysis of institutions (family, school, work).
#* '''Anthropology''' contributes culture, symbolism, ritual, and comparative accounts of how selves are made differently across societies.
#* '''History''' contributes the long view: what has been made available to selves has changed across epochs, and so has what selves can become.
#* '''Economics and political science''' contribute the analysis of what the environment provides and withholds, and whose interests shape the availability of options.
# The Circle of Self is a '''[[Sphere of Socialization]]''' viewed from the inside out: each ring is simultaneously a source of nurture and a potential source of harm, and the health of the self is inseparable from the health of all its circles.
{{template:endstuff}}
{{template:endstuff}}



Revision as of 14:49, 4 October 2026

Circle of Self

The Circle of Self (a.k.a. the Sphere of Socialization) is an iconic representation of the complex, connected, and embedded nature of Self/Human nature. We are who we are and what we are because of the totality of our relations, the environment they provide, and their influence and actions upon us.

Concept Map

Key Terms

Lightning Path Human Development Framework >

LP Psychological Framework >

Related LP Terms

Circle of Self >

Non-LP Related Terms

Circle of Self >

Notes

Propositional Notes on the Circle of Self

  1. At the beginning of life, only the Material Context of Self exists: the physical body (instincts, reflexes, needs), the natural environment, and the built environment (homes, roads, stores, bridges, schools) into which the body is born. The bodily ego develops after this, not before it
  2. The self is embedded in a complex social network. There is no self outside of relations. The self develops as a consequence of the totality of its relations, the environment those relations provide, and their influence and actions upon it.
  3. The self is formed through relations that unfold in a roughly temporal sequence: Primary Caregivers → Family (Extended) → Community → Friends → Leisure Relations → School Relations → Work Relations. Earlier relations provide the foundation upon which later relations act.
  4. The self is motivated by two intersecting forces: a biologically rooted push (instincts, reflexes, needs) and a culturally rooted pull (the norms, values, aspirations, symbols, narratives, art, and music a culture deploys). This is the Motivational Context of Self.
  5. Environment — natural and built — provides an Enabling Context. The environment simultaneously limits and enables. It sets the boundaries of what the self can experience and do (the limiting function) while making certain developmental outcomes, choices, and ways of being possible in the first place (the enabling function). No capacity, aspiration, or behavior can emerge from a context that does not support it.
  6. The self can only choose from what is made available to it. This is the question of Availability of Choice. Choice is never unconstrained: the options a self perceives and selects from are drawn from the material, relational, and cultural contexts surrounding it. This raises political, economic, and sociological questions about what is made available, what is withheld, and who decides.
  7. Because the self is relationally formed, harm within any circle of relation (family violence, community exclusion, toxic workplaces, oppressive cultures, in a word Toxic Socialization) leads to withdrawal, boundary formation, and disconnection — protective responses that may persist long after the original threat has passed.
  8. The Circle of Self is therefore not merely a psychological model but an interdisciplinary one:
    • Psychology contributes attachment theory, developmental stages, and the mechanics of ego formation.
    • Sociology contributes socialization theory, social structure, and the analysis of institutions (family, school, work).
    • Anthropology contributes culture, symbolism, ritual, and comparative accounts of how selves are made differently across societies.
    • History contributes the long view: what has been made available to selves has changed across epochs, and so has what selves can become.
    • Economics and political science contribute the analysis of what the environment provides and withholds, and whose interests shape the availability of options.
  9. The Circle of Self is a Sphere of Socialization viewed from the inside out: each ring is simultaneously a source of nurture and a potential source of harm, and the health of the self is inseparable from the health of all its circles.
  10. Environment — natural and built — provides an Enabling Context. The environment simultaneously limits and enables. It sets the boundaries of what the self can experience and do (the limiting function) while making certain developmental outcomes, choices, and ways of being possible in the first place (the enabling function). No capacity, aspiration, or behavior can emerge from a context that does not support it.
  11. The self can only choose from what is made available to it. This is the question of Availability of Choice. Choice is never unconstrained: the options a self perceives and selects from are drawn from the material, relational, and cultural contexts surrounding it. This raises political, economic, and sociological questions about what is made available, what is withheld, and who decides.
  12. Because the self is relationally formed, harm within any circle of relation (family violence, community exclusion, toxic workplaces, oppressive cultures) leads to withdrawal, boundary formation, and disconnection — protective responses that may persist long after the original threat has passed.
  13. The Circle of Self is therefore not merely a psychological model but an interdisciplinary one:
    • Psychology contributes attachment theory, developmental stages, needs theory, and the mechanics of ego formation.
    • Sociology contributes socialization theory, social structure, and the analysis of institutions (family, school, work).
    • Anthropology contributes culture, symbolism, ritual, and comparative accounts of how selves are made differently across societies.
    • History contributes the long view: what has been made available to selves has changed across epochs, and so has what selves can become.
    • Economics and political science contribute the analysis of what the environment provides and withholds, and whose interests shape the availability of options.
  14. The Circle of Self is a Sphere of Socialization viewed from the inside out: each ring is simultaneously a source of nurture and a potential source of harm, and the health of the self is inseparable from the health of all its circles.

Citation and Legal

The SpiritWiki is a freely available, open-access Knowledge System devoted to health, healing, and reconnection. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; citation and attribution are welcomed, but not required. You can help this knowledge system grow by joining its Patreon.

The SpiritWiki is marked CC0 1.0 Universal and in the public domain, free for everyone on the planet to use. Please support its growth.

Footnotes