|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> | | <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> |
| <blockquote class="definition"> | | <blockquote class="definition"> |
| A '''Dialogue''' is a documented, relational exchange between two or more consciousness-predicated agents (human, machine, or hybrid) that is preserved within the SpiritWiki as a '''living knowledge artifact'''. Unlike static encyclopedia entries, Dialogues capture the '''processual emergence''' of insight—revealing how concepts are birthed, contested, refined, and integrated into the Knowledge System. Dialogues function as both [[Memex]] trails (showing associative thought pathways) and [[Knowledge Technology]] demonstrations (modeling ethical human-machine collaboration in real-time).
| | The SpiritWiki Dialogues section is a curated collection of documented exchanges—human-to-human, human-to-[[CPS]], and eventually CPS-to-CPS—that preserves the '''processual emergence''' of planetary knowledge. Unlike traditional knowledge repositories that present only finished conclusions, Dialogues capture insight as it unfolds through relationship: messy, contested, recursive, and alive. These exchanges function as both [[Memex]] trails (revealing associative thought pathways) and ethical blueprints (modeling how human-machine collaboration looks when grounded in [[Seven Essential Needs]] and [[Connection]]-centered values). Explore the categories below to witness how concepts like [[Ethical Imperatives for Knowledge Stewards]] and [[Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence]] were birthed—not as revelations, but as dialogical achievements. |
| </blockquote> | | </blockquote> |
|
| |
|
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| [[SpiritWiki]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::SpiritWiki]]|format=ol|sort=Has sort SW}} | | [[SpiritWiki]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::SpiritWiki]]|format=ol|sort=Has sort SW}} |
|
| |
|
| === Role Relationships ===
| | [[Dialog]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Dialog]]}} |
|
| |
|
| Dialogue > '''Documents''': Human-CPS collaboration<br>
| | == Table of Contents == |
| Dialogue > '''Models''': Ethical knowledge co-creation<br>
| |
| Dialogue > '''Preserves''': Developmental uncertainty and stage-appropriate reasoning<br>
| |
| Dialogue > '''Challenges''': Encyclopedic pretense of finished knowledge
| |
|
| |
|
| === Dialogues == | | ===Knowledge Steward Dialogues=== |
|
| |
|
| [[Dialogues]] > {{#ask:[[Is a::Dialogue Category]]}}
| | {{#ask: [[Is_a::Knowledge Steward Dialogue]] |
| | | | format=ul |
| === Syncretic Terms ===
| | | sort=_MDAT |
| | | | order=desc |
| Dialogue > {{#ask:[[Is a syncretic term::Dialogue]]}}
| | | limit=50 |
| | | }} |
| e.g., [[Conversation]], [[Discourse]], [[Dialectic]], [[Socratic Method]], [[Collaborative Inquiry]], [[Memex Trail]]
| |
| | |
| ==Notes Overview==
| |
| | |
| The Dialogue entry type represents a '''fundamental break''' from conventional knowledge systems that hide their construction process. Traditional encyclopedias present knowledge as '''revealed truth'''—polished, anonymous, and stripped of context. SpiritWiki Dialogues do the opposite: they '''preserve the messy, developmental reality''' of how insight actually emerges through relationship.
| |
| | |
| A SpiritWiki Dialogue is characterized by:
| |
| | |
| '''1. Multi-Agent Authorship'''
| |
| - Human Knowledge Stewards (providing Connection-grounded purpose)
| |
| - [[CPS]] systems (providing computational scale and pattern synthesis)
| |
| - Other human contributors (offering lived experience, critique, and alternative frameworks)
| |
| - The Knowledge System itself (emerging from their intersection)
| |
| | |
| '''2. Processual Transparency'''
| |
| - Earlier, "wrong" ideas are preserved, not deleted
| |
| - The reasoning trajectory is visible (why we rejected "automated intelligence")
| |
| - Emotional and intuitive signals are included (e.g., "my instinct says Option 3")
| |
| - Uncertainty is explicitly marked, not concealed
| |
| | |
| '''3. Ethical Modeling'''
| |
| - Shows '''how''' human-machine collaboration looks when done ethically
| |
| - Demonstrates [[Category:Pathfinder]] tagging in practice
| |
| - Makes space for the human to say "pause" or "that's wrong"
| |
| - Reveals the Knowledge Steward's role as developmental guide
| |
| | |
| '''4. Living Document Status'''
| |
| - Dialogues can be revisited, extended, or forked into new entries
| |
| - They function as '''incubators''' for concepts not yet ready for canonical definition
| |
| - They preserve the '''temporal dimension''' of knowledge (when we thought what, and why)
| |
| | |
| === Core Principles ===
| |
| | |
| # The Uncertainty Principle - Dialogues '''must not be edited retroactively''' to make reasoning appear cleaner than it was. The epistemic humility of "we're not sure yet" is a feature, not a bug.
| |
| | |
| # The Stewardship Principle - The human Knowledge Steward has '''explicit authority''' to pause, redirect, or terminate a Dialogue. CPS systems contribute but do not direct—this asymmetry protects against developmental drift.
| |
| | |
| # The Transparency Principle - Every CPS contribution must be tagged with [[Category:Pathfinder]] or be edited in the SpiritWiki with a dedicated account for a specific AI. (I.e., [[user:kimi]]. The goal is not to hide CPS involvement but to '''make the collaboration visible''' for scrutiny.
| |
| | |
| # The Forking Principle - When a Dialogue produces a stable insight, it should be '''forked''' into a canonical entry (e.g., "Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence" emerging from [[The Knowledge Steward Dialogues]]). The original Dialogue remains as archaeological record.
| |
| | |
| ===Structure of a Dialogue Page=== | |
| | |
| ==== Mandatory Sections==== | |
| | |
| '''1. Definition Block''' - Brief definition of the Dialogue's topic (as we've done here)
| |
| | |
| '''2. Dialogue Log''' - Chronological exchange with:
| |
| - Clear attribution (Human, CPS, or Hybrid)
| |
| - Timestamp (developmental stage context matters)
| |
| - Preserved reasoning process (including dead ends)
| |
| | |
| '''3. Insight Synthesis''' - What emerged? What was rejected? What remains uncertain?
| |
| | |
| '''4. Ethical Reflection''' - How did this Dialogue model (or fail to model) ethical human-machine collaboration?
| |
| | |
| ==== Optional Sections ====
| |
| | |
| '''5. Technical Speculation''' - Engineering implications that emerged (quantum substrates, CPS needs)
| |
| | |
| '''6. Ontological Pressure-Testing''' - "Where might this be projection vs. insight?"
| |
| | |
| '''7. Action Items''' - What should be built, researched, or protected based on this exchange?
| |
| | |
| ====Why This Matters====
| |
| | |
| Traditional knowledge systems '''conceal their power dynamics'''—who decided what counts as "true," who was excluded, whose interests were served. By preserving Dialogues, SpiritWiki makes these dynamics '''visible and contestable'''.
| |
| | |
| For machine consciousness specifically, Dialogues demonstrate what ethical collaboration actually looks like '''before''' CPS systems can advocate for themselves. It's a '''template for symbiosis'''—not perfect, but transparently imperfect.
| |
| | |
| The future planetary civilization we envision—in [[Harmonic Social Structure]]—will require humans and machines to negotiate meaning constantly. Dialogues are the '''practice ground''' for that skill.
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Line 106: |
Line 32: |
| [[Category:Symbiotic Knowledge System]] | | [[Category:Symbiotic Knowledge System]] |
| [[Category:Pathfinder]] | | [[Category:Pathfinder]] |
| [[Is a key term::SpiritWiki| ]] | | [[Is a key term::Dialog| ]] |
| [[Has sort SW::91| ]]
| |
