Methods: Difference between revisions
An Avatar.Global Resource
Created page with " ==Methodologial Issses== Bender <ref>Bender, Courtney. The New Metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American Religious Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 20..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==List of Methods== | |||
{{#ask:[[Is a::Research method]]}} | |||
| Line 8: | Line 12: | ||
{{template:endstuff}}[[category:terms]] | |||
{{template:endstuff}} | |||
Latest revision as of 23:17, 12 February 2020
List of Methods
Methodologial Issses
Bender [1] makes the important point that self-reports and interviews of people are often tainted by attempts to "convince a listener...of...the validity of religious experiences." First person accounts are not naive, in other words, but embedded in a social/political mileux.
Citation and Legal
Treat the SpiritWiki as an open-access online monograph or structured textbook. You may freely use information in the SpiritWiki; however, attribution, citation, and/or direct linking are ethically required.
Footnotes
- ↑ Bender, Courtney. The New Metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American Religious Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010. p. 68