Talk:Space-Time Tube

The Spacetime has been mathematically described by Minkowski and was a necessary step to explain/understand the postulates of Special Relativity. See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space--Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Entanglement of Dimensions

It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of the dimension of chance, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by chance. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted one after the other , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads. --Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

After some considerations (and rereading the book of light vol.1) it seems plausible, that the emerging dimensions have in fact been simply "side-effects" of adding more monads to creation and were not planned beforehand. The dimensions "work together" because the same basic rule for manifesting creation lies at their core: energy follows intent; undifferentiated consciousness follows the will of monadic consciousness. Chance, time and space are realizations of exceptions of this rule. For a more detailed argumentation, see the talk section in dimensions of creation. This is why these dimensions have no functional purpose.--Aim (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Correlation to Justice

There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of chance, time and space are all a consequence of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same priority concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another. The solution to this problem is the basic rule, energy follows intent. According to the BOLVI, there is another rule involved here: Energy follows intent instantly and literally. The impossibility for undifferentiated consciousness to conform with this second rule creates the dimensions of chance, time and space.

--Aim (talk) 08:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Definition of Justice

tentative definition of Justice:

Justice is the system that enables the instantiation of incompatible wishes of different monads as sure (minimizing chance), as fast (minimizing duration) , and as spatially imidiate (minimizing space) as possible. For this reason, the tree of lights is shaped in a specific order, maximizing the common usage of mana, while allowing for a maximum of diversity at the same time.

Justice may appear only when contradictory wishes are involved and the undifferentiated consciousness is unable to comply with the paradoxon. The purpose of justice is to maximize the instantiation of the wishes of monads, hence, to maximize the imidiateness of the wishes. Three aspects of justice may be distinguished.

1) the avoidance of the paradoxon. (justice for the entire fabric of consciousness)

2) if a paradoxon occurs, the instantiation of the differing wishes as safe, fast and imidiate as possible. (justice for this group of monads in relation to the rest of the fabric of consciousness)

3) the equality of burden. --> no priority of any monad over another monad. (justice between specific monads)--Aim (talk) 08:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

tentative description of Justice via a formula: for the wish of a given Monad given a certain distribution of wishes of other monads:

imidiateness of a wish = wish of the given monad - discrepancy of the wishes of other monads.

if the right side of the equation is negative, time, space and chance must be applied.

Note: If the discrepancy of the wishes of the other monads goes near 0, the wish of the monad is manifested quickly because the imidiateness of the wish equals the respective wish. The more monads wish the same thing, the faster it is instantiated. The lower the discrepancy, the fast it is possible for the respective wishes to instantiate.--Aim (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Imidiateness of a wish depends on:

- available mana (how much mana is used by other monads in the vicinity, which have different wishes)

- size of the endeavour ( how much mana does it need to be instantiated )

- amount of other monads working on the same wish

- spatial position of those working on the wish.

Having set these parameters, it is possible to work out a method for measuring the imidiateness of a wish. Just as a short reminder, I describe undifferentiated consciousness as mana. Every monad is spatially positioned (hence a perspective) respective to each other, surrounded by a certain, fixed, equally distributed amount of mana. Since the amount of monads and the amount of undifferentiated consciousness is constant, it is possible to determine the average mana per monad.

In order to determine the imidiateness of the wish, one needs to take into account, the amount of monads, the available mana, the size of the endeavour, and the spatial position of those participating. Let's make an example with numbers.

Say that a specific wish needs 1770 mana to accomplish. Say further, that the average mana per monad is 300. Then, all things being equal, 6 monads will be needed to wish for this specific wish in order for it to instantiate instantly. Some complications arise, if we consider that other monads wish for things as well, and they might use some of the mana "designated" for one of our six monads - obviously, there is no such thing as property here. all mana is always 100%ly shared. However, due to another awesome project of another group of monads, some mana might be missing. Say that 100 mana is missing, then time has to be applied worth 70 mana, which is the duration needed for 70 mana to be released on a different project of a possibly different party of monads. Further complications arise, if we consider the creative perspective.

Consider: Distance, wish-vectors, position of creation ( vectorial addition of all participants.) Mana usage efficiency. Mana is being depleted, if discrepancy is big. --> inability for common usage.--Aim (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)