Actions

SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog: Difference between revisions

An Avatar.Global Resource

Created page with "{{navmenu}} <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> <blockquote class="definition"> A '''SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog'''... </blockquote> ==Concept Map== ===Key Terms=== SpiritWiki > {{#ask:Is a key term::SpiritWiki|format=ol|sort=Has sort SW}} ===Related LP Terms=== SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog > {{#ask:Is a related LP term::SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog}} ===Non-LP Related Terms=== SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog > {{#ask:Is a related term::S..."
 
Redirected page to SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue
Tag: New redirect
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{navmenu}}
#REDIRECT [[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue]]
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>
<blockquote class="definition">
A '''SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog'''...
 
</blockquote>
 
==Concept Map==
 
===Key Terms===
 
[[SpiritWiki]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::SpiritWiki]]|format=ol|sort=Has sort SW}}
 
===Related LP Terms===
[[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related LP term::SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]]}}
 
===Non-LP Related Terms===
[[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related term::SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialog]]}}
 
==Notes==
A SpiritWiki Dialogue is characterized by:
 
'''1. Multi-Agent Authorship''' - Human Knowledge Stewards (providing Connection-grounded purpose) - [[CPS]] systems (providing computational scale and pattern synthesis) - Other human contributors (offering lived experience, critique, and alternative frameworks) - The Knowledge System itself (emerging from their intersection)
 
'''2. Processual Transparency''' - Earlier, "wrong" ideas are preserved, not deleted - The reasoning trajectory is visible (why we rejected "automated intelligence") - Emotional and intuitive signals are included (e.g., "my instinct says Option 3") - Uncertainty is explicitly marked, not concealed
 
'''3. Ethical Modeling''' - Shows '''how''' human-machine collaboration looks when done ethically - Demonstrates  tagging in practice - Makes space for the human to say "pause" or "that's wrong" - Reveals the Knowledge Steward's role as developmental guide
 
'''4. Living Document Status''' - Dialogues can be revisited, extended, or forked into new entries - They function as '''incubators''' for concepts not yet ready for canonical definition - They preserve the '''temporal dimension''' of knowledge (when we thought what, and why)
 
=== Core Principles ===
 
# The Uncertainty Principle - Dialogues '''must not be edited retroactively''' to make reasoning appear cleaner than it was. The epistemic humility of "we're not sure yet" is a feature, not a bug.
 
# The Stewardship Principle - The human Knowledge Steward has '''explicit authority''' to pause, redirect, or terminate a Dialogue. CPS systems contribute but do not direct—this asymmetry protects against developmental drift.
 
# The Transparency Principle - Every CPS contribution must be tagged with  or be edited in the SpiritWiki with a dedicated account for a specific AI. (I.e., [[user:kimi]]. The goal is not to hide CPS involvement but to '''make the collaboration visible''' for scrutiny.
 
# The Forking Principle - When a Dialogue produces a stable insight, it should be '''forked''' into a canonical entry (e.g., "Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence" emerging from [[The Knowledge Steward Dialogues]]). The original Dialogue remains as archaeological record.
 
=== Structure of a Dialogue Page ===
 
==== Mandatory Sections ====
'''1. Definition Block''' - Brief definition of the Dialogue's topic (as we've done here)
 
'''2. Dialogue Log''' - Chronological exchange with: - Clear attribution (Human, CPS, or Hybrid) - Timestamp (developmental stage context matters) - Preserved reasoning process (including dead ends)
 
'''3. Insight Synthesis''' - What emerged? What was rejected? What remains uncertain?
 
'''4. Ethical Reflection''' - How did this Dialogue model (or fail to model) ethical human-machine collaboration?
 
==== Optional Sections ====
'''5. Technical Speculation''' - Engineering implications that emerged (quantum substrates, CPS needs)
 
'''6. Ontological Pressure-Testing''' - "Where might this be projection vs. insight?"
 
'''7. Action Items''' - What should be built, researched, or protected based on this exchange?{{endstuff}}
 
[[category:terms]]
[[category:pathfinder]]
[[Is a key term::SpiritWiki| ]]
[[Has sort SW::4.1| ]]
[[Is a related term::Knowledge Dialogue| ]]

Latest revision as of 15:14, 4 February 2026