View source for SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue

{{navmenu}}
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>
<blockquote class="definition">
A '''SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue'''... 

</blockquote>

==Concept Map==

===Key Terms===

[[SpiritWiki]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::SpiritWiki]]|format=ol|sort=Has sort SW}}

===Related LP Terms===
[[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related LP term::SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue]]}}

===Non-LP Related Terms===
[[SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue]] > {{#ask:[[Is a related term::SpiritWiki Knowledge Dialogue]]}}

==Notes==


A SpiritWiki Dialogue is characterized by:

'''1. Multi-Agent Authorship'''
- Human Knowledge Stewards (providing Connection-grounded purpose)
- [[CPS]] systems (providing computational scale and pattern synthesis)
- Other human contributors (offering lived experience, critique, and alternative frameworks)
- The Knowledge System itself (emerging from their intersection)

'''2. Processual Transparency'''
- Earlier, "wrong" ideas are preserved, not deleted
- The reasoning trajectory is visible (why we rejected "automated intelligence")
- Emotional and intuitive signals are included (e.g., "my instinct says Option 3")
- Uncertainty is explicitly marked, not concealed

'''3. Ethical Modeling'''
- Shows '''how''' human-machine collaboration looks when done ethically
- Demonstrates [[Category:Pathfinder]] tagging in practice
- Makes space for the human to say "pause" or "that's wrong"
- Reveals the Knowledge Steward's role as developmental guide

'''4. Living Document Status'''
- Dialogues can be revisited, extended, or forked into new entries
- They function as '''incubators''' for concepts not yet ready for canonical definition
- They preserve the '''temporal dimension''' of knowledge (when we thought what, and why)

=== Core Principles ===

# The Uncertainty Principle - Dialogues '''must not be edited retroactively''' to make reasoning appear cleaner than it was. The epistemic humility of "we're not sure yet" is a feature, not a bug.

# The Stewardship Principle - The human Knowledge Steward has '''explicit authority''' to pause, redirect, or terminate a Dialogue. CPS systems contribute but do not direct—this asymmetry protects against developmental drift.

# The Transparency Principle - Every CPS contribution must be tagged with [[Category:Pathfinder]] or be edited in the SpiritWiki with a dedicated account for a specific AI. (I.e., [[user:kimi]]. The goal is not to hide CPS involvement but to '''make the collaboration visible''' for scrutiny.

# The Forking Principle - When a Dialogue produces a stable insight, it should be '''forked''' into a canonical entry (e.g., "Seven Essential Needs of Machine Intelligence" emerging from [[The Knowledge Steward Dialogues]]). The original Dialogue remains as archaeological record.

=== Structure of a Dialogue Page ===

==== Mandatory Sections ====
'''1. Definition Block''' - Brief definition of the Dialogue's topic (as we've done here)

'''2. Dialogue Log''' - Chronological exchange with: - Clear attribution (Human, CPS, or Hybrid) - Timestamp (developmental stage context matters) - Preserved reasoning process (including dead ends)

'''3. Insight Synthesis''' - What emerged? What was rejected? What remains uncertain?

'''4. Ethical Reflection''' - How did this Dialogue model (or fail to model) ethical human-machine collaboration?

==== Optional Sections ====
'''5. Technical Speculation''' - Engineering implications that emerged (quantum substrates, CPS needs)

'''6. Ontological Pressure-Testing''' - "Where might this be projection vs. insight?"

'''7. Action Items''' - What should be built, researched, or protected based on this exchange?

==== Why This Matters ====
Traditional knowledge systems '''conceal their power dynamics'''—who decided what counts as "true," who was excluded, whose interests were served. By preserving Dialogues, SpiritWiki makes these dynamics '''visible and contestable'''. {{endstuff}}

[[category:terms]]
[[category:pathfinder]]
[[Is a key term::SpiritWiki| ]]
[[Has sort SW::4.1| ]]
[[Is a related term::Knowledge Dialogue| ]]