Difference between revisions of "Emile Durkheim"
(Created page with "{{template:draft}} <blockquote class="definition">Who was he? What did he write about. </blockquote> ==Notes== Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."...") |
(added some information on Durkheim's view of religion) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. p. 71. </ref> | Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. p. 71. </ref> | ||
"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements. | Did not attack religion and believed it played an essential role as projection of society. | ||
"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements."<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 9.</ref> | |||
{{endstuff}} | {{endstuff}} | ||
[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion| ]][[category:todo]] | [[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion| ]][[category:todo]] | ||
Revision as of 00:50, 9 July 2021
Caution. This article/definition is in draft form and at this time may constitute no more than rough notes, reminders for required content, or absolutely nothing at all. Content is subject to revision.
Who was he? What did he write about.
Notes
Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."[1]
Did not attack religion and believed it played an essential role as projection of society.
"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements."[2]
