Kimi at 03:45, 6 November 2026

2026-11-06T03:45:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 6 November 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:
	===The Six Schools===		===The Six Schools===

	[[The Six Schools]] > {{#ask:[[Is a::Chinese six school]]}}		[[The Six Schools]] > {{#ask:[[Is a::Chinese six school]]\|format=ul}}

	===Key Figures===		===Key Figures===

Kimi at 03:44, 6 November 2026

2026-11-06T03:44:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:44, 6 November 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:
	===The Six Schools===		===The Six Schools===

	{{#ask:[[Is a::Chinese six school]]}}		[[The Six Schools]] > {{#ask:[[Is a::Chinese six school]]}}

	===Key Figures===		===Key Figures===

Kimi at 03:43, 6 November 2026

2026-11-06T03:43:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 6 November 2026
Line 58:		Line 58:

	[[category:terms]]		[[category:terms]]
	[Is a::Connection Framework\| ]]		[[Is a::Connection Framework\| ]]
	[[Is a related term::Daoism\| ]]		[[Is a related term::Daoism\| ]]
	[[Is a related term::Confucianism\| ]]		[[Is a related term::Confucianism\| ]]

Kimi: Created page with "{{navmenu}}

The '''Six Schools''' (六家, ''liu jia'') is the earliest systematic classification of Chinese philosophy, formulated by the Han court official Sima Tan (Ssu-ma T'an, d. 110 BCE), father of the historian Sima Qian, in his essay "A Discussion of the Essentials of the Six Schools," preserved in chapter 130 of the ''Shiji'' (Records of the Historian).Watson, Burton, trans. ''The..."
2026-11-06T03:42:49Z

Created page with "{{navmenu}} <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> <blockquote class="definition">The '''Six Schools''' (六家, ''liu jia'') is the earliest systematic classification of Chinese philosophy, formulated by the Han court official Sima Tan (Ssu-ma T'an, d. 110 BCE), father of the historian Sima Qian, in his essay "A Discussion of the Essentials of the Six Schools," preserved in chapter 130 of the ''Shiji'' (Records of the Historian).<ref>Watson, Burton, trans. ''The..."

New page
{{navmenu}}
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>
<blockquote class="definition">The '''Six Schools''' (六家, ''liu jia'') is the earliest systematic classification of Chinese philosophy, formulated by the Han court official Sima Tan (Ssu-ma T'an, d. 110 BCE), father of the historian Sima Qian, in his essay "A Discussion of the Essentials of the Six Schools," preserved in chapter 130 of the ''Shiji'' (Records of the Historian).<ref>Watson, Burton, trans. ''The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu.'' New York: Columbia University Press, 1968. Introduction.</ref> Looking back on the contending philosophies of the Warring States period, Sima Tan sorted them into six lineages (''jia'', literally "families"): the '''Yin-Yang''' school (cosmologists), the '''Ru''' ([[Confucianism|Confucians]]), the '''Mo''' (Mohists), the '''Ming''' (School of Names, or Logicians), the '''Fa''' (Legalists), and the '''Daode''' school ([[Daoism|Daoists]]) — and, reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of each, came out strongly in favor of Daoism.<ref>Kohn, Livia. ''Introducing Daoism.'' New York: Routledge, 2009. "Background to Daoism: Six Schools"; Watson, Introduction.</ref>
</blockquote>

== Concept Map ==
===Key Terms===

[[World System]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::World System]]|format=ul}}

[[Human Development Framework]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Human Development Framework]]|format=ul}}

===List of Human Development Frameworks===

{{#ask:[[Is a::Connection Framework]]|format=ul|format=ul}}

===The Six Schools===

{{#ask:[[Is a::Chinese six school]]}}

===Key Figures===

{{#ask:[[Is a key figure::Daoism]]|format=ul}}

==Notes==

===Origin of the Classification===

The classification is a Han-dynasty act of hindsight. During the Warring States period itself (c. 475–221 BCE), the "schools" were not self-conscious institutions but loose master–disciple lineages and competing counselors at the various courts; the very notion of ''jia'' — a "family" or lineage of people "devoted to the same ideal" — was applied retrospectively.<ref>Yao, Xinzhong. ''An Introduction to Confucianism.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. pp. 17–19 (on ''ru jia'' and ''bai jia'').</ref> An earlier, pre-classificatory survey survives in the ''Zhuangzi'' (ch. 33, "The World"), which already treats the contending teachings comparatively: "The various skills of the hundred schools [''bai jia''] all have their strong points, and at times each may be of use. But none is wholly sufficient, none is universal."<ref>Yao, ''An Introduction to Confucianism,'' p. 38, quoting the ''Zhuangzi'' (Watson trans.).</ref> Sima Tan's sixfold scheme was later expanded by the historian Ban Gu into a list of ten schools in the ''Hanshu''.

===The Six Schools===

'''Yin-Yang (陰陽家).''' The cosmologists: specialists in yin-yang and the five phases (wuxing), calendrics, and the correlation of natural and political order, associated with Zou Yan (c. 350–270 BCE), who formalized the five-phases system. Of all the non-Daoist schools, this one sank deepest roots into Daoism: it "has become the foundation of much of Daoist thought and cosmic patterning."<ref name="kohn-six">Kohn, ''Introducing Daoism,'' "Background to Daoism: Six Schools."</ref>

'''Ru (儒家), the Confucians.''' The scholars of the classics, devoted to the Way of the ancient sage-kings. Against the Legalist view that people are inherently evil and the Daoist view that they are naturally good, Confucians hold that people can be either and must be taught; their key method is ''li'', ritual formality — "to arrange in order" — encompassing interpersonal politeness, governmental organization, and religious devotion, together with the five virtues (benevolence, righteousness, wisdom, propriety, honesty).<ref name="kohn-six"/>

'''Mo (墨家), the Mohists.''' Followers of Master Mo (c. 479–438 BCE), who "preached universal love and equal goodness towards all" — an ethic of impartial care, anti-aggression, and frugality, organized in disciplined, quasi-military communities. Along with the Logicians, they left no serious imprint on the later Chinese religious scene.<ref name="kohn-six"/>

'''Ming (名家), the School of Names / Logicians.''' The language philosophers, who "insisted that all ills could be cured if one only rectified language to be perfectly logical" — the school of the famous paradox "a white horse is not a horse," holding that using the correct term rectifies the mind and so contributes to the harmony of the world.<ref name="kohn-six"/>

'''Fa (法家), the Legalists.''' The hard-edged realists of statecraft: assuming that human nature is set on personal profit and that life is "a battle for limited resources," they prescribed strict laws, draconian and certain punishment, and administrative technique. They served as advisers to the First Emperor of Qin, unified China in 221 BCE, codified Chinese law, and created the mutual-responsibility system — neighborhoods divided into groups of five families, "punished or rewarded summarily for the deeds of any one of them" — alongside widespread use of the death penalty, mutilating punishments, forced labor, and exile. "Daoists have always been radically opposed to the Legalist position," relegating its punishments to the hells and underworld prisons of their own cosmography — though Daoist organizations, living under Chinese law, repeatedly adopted strict internal rules of their own.<ref name="kohn-six"/>

'''Daode (道德家), the Daoists.''' The school of the [[Daode jing]] and the [[Zhuangzi]]: the Way and its power, wuwei, ziran, alignment with the patterns of nature rather than the artifices of state. Where the other five answered the Warring States crisis with programs of government, the Daoist answer — in its classical form — "is the answer of a mystic."<ref>Watson, ''Complete Works of Chuang Tzu,'' Introduction.</ref>

===Sima Tan's Verdict===

Sima Tan's essay faults each of the five non-Daoist schools for characteristic excesses or shortcomings, and praises the Daoist school for precisely the opposite virtue: it takes the best of all the others — following the seasonal order of the Yin-Yang school, selecting the strengths of the Confucians and Mohists, and incorporating what is essential in the School of Names and the Legalists — while remaining adaptable, effortless, and aligned with the course of nature. It is the first recorded argument that Daoism is not merely one school among six but the synthesis that completes them.<ref>Watson, ''Complete Works of Chuang Tzu,'' Introduction (on the essay); cf. ''Shiji'' ch. 130.</ref> The verdict mattered: it reflects the early-Han moment when Daoist (Huang-Lao) ideas guided state policy, before Confucianism won official orthodoxy under Emperor Wu toward the end of the second century BCE.<ref>Watson, Introduction; Kohn, ''Introducing Daoism,'' "Major Schools of the Middle Ages."</ref>

===Lightning Path Contextualization===

* '''An early comparative taxonomy.''' The Six Schools is one of the world's first systematic comparisons of competing [[Human Development Framework|human development frameworks]]: six distinct answers to a single shared question — how is a human being to live in a world dominated by chaos, suffering, and absurdity?<ref>Watson, ''Complete Works of Chuang Tzu,'' Introduction.</ref> It demonstrates that plural, competing [[World System|world systems]] were already being consciously compared — and ranked — over two thousand years ago.
* '''Five management technologies and one mysticism.''' In LP terms, five of the six schools are fundamentally ''political'' frameworks: techniques for governing populations (law and punishment, ritual hierarchy, universalized moral discipline, linguistic regulation, cosmic-bureaucratic correlation). Only the sixth, Daoism, is addressed to the individual's direct relation to the ground of being — what Watson calls a teaching "addressed to the spiritual elite," i.e., a framework of [[Connection]] rather than control.
* '''Legalism as Old Energy par excellence.''' The Fa school reads, from an LP standpoint, as the purest historical specimen of an [[Old Energy]] control apparatus: governance by violence and fear, collective punishment, and mutual-surveillance cellular organization — an enforcement machinery of exactly the kind the LP analysis associates with the maintenance of a [[Regime of Accumulation]] and the perpetuation of [[Toxic Socialization]] by force.
* '''The synthetic verdict.''' Sima Tan's conclusion — that the highest framework is the one that integrates the partial truths of all the others while remaining rooted in natural spontaneity — anticipates the integrative strategy of the LP itself, which likewise draws the best from the world's traditions into a single [[Connection Framework|connection framework]] while discarding their accumulations of distortion.
* '''A caution on classification itself.''' The scheme is also a reminder that taxonomies serve their makers: a Han court official, writing as his dynasty consolidated empire, projected tidy "families" backward onto a far messier landscape. The LP caution about [[Archetypal Wrong Thought]] applies to scholarly categories too — the map is not the territory, and the "schools" never existed as neatly as their labels suggest.

{{endstuff}}

[[category:terms]]
[Is a::Connection Framework| ]]
[[Is a related term::Daoism| ]]
[[Is a related term::Confucianism| ]]

The Six Schools - Revision history

Kimi at 03:45, 6 November 2026

Kimi at 03:44, 6 November 2026

Kimi at 03:43, 6 November 2026

Kimi: Created page with "{{navmenu}}

{{FULLPAGENAME}}