Talk:Space-Time Tube - Revision history

Aim: /* Definition of Justice */

2017-06-18T22:10:44Z

Definition of Justice

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 18 June 2017
Line 37:		Line 37:

	1) the avoidance of the paradoxon. (justice for the entire fabric of consciousness)		1) the avoidance of the paradoxon. (justice for the entire fabric of consciousness)

	2) if a paradoxon occurs, the instantiation of the differing wishes as safe, fast and imidiate as possible. (justice for this group of monads in relation to the rest of the fabric of consciousness)		2) if a paradoxon occurs, the instantiation of the differing wishes as safe, fast and imidiate as possible. (justice for this group of monads in relation to the rest of the fabric of consciousness)

	3) the equality of burden. --> no priority of any monad over another monad. (justice between specific monads)--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 08:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)		3) the equality of burden. --> no priority of any monad over another monad. (justice between specific monads)--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 08:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Aim: /* Entanglement of Dimensions */

2017-06-18T22:08:22Z

Entanglement of Dimensions

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 18 June 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)		--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

	After some considerations (and rereading the book of light vol.1) it seems plausible, that the emerging dimensions have in fact been simply "side-effects" of adding more monads to creation and were not planned beforehand. The dimensions "work together" because the same basic rule for manifesting creation lies at their core: energy follows intent; undifferentiated consciousness follows the will of monadic consciousness. Chance, time and space are realizations of exceptions of this rule. For a more detailed argumentation, see the talk section in dimensions of creation. This is why these dimensions have no functional purpose		After some considerations (and rereading the book of light vol.1) it seems plausible, that the emerging dimensions have in fact been simply "side-effects" of adding more monads to creation and were not planned beforehand. The dimensions "work together" because the same basic rule for manifesting creation lies at their core: energy follows intent; undifferentiated consciousness follows the will of monadic consciousness. Chance, time and space are realizations of exceptions of this rule. For a more detailed argumentation, see the talk section in dimensions of creation. This is why these dimensions have no functional purpose.--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 22:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

	== Correlation to Justice ==		== Correlation to Justice ==

Aim: /* Definition of Justice */

2017-06-11T09:38:52Z

Definition of Justice

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 11 June 2017
Line 67:		Line 67:
	Further complications arise, if we consider the creative perspective.		Further complications arise, if we consider the creative perspective.

	Consider: Distance, wish-vectors, position of creation ( vectorial addition of all participants.) Mana usage efficiency. Mana is being depleted, if discrepancy is big. --> inability for common usage.		Consider: Distance, wish-vectors, position of creation ( vectorial addition of all participants.) Mana usage efficiency. Mana is being depleted, if discrepancy is big. --> inability for common usage.--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 09:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Aim: /* Definition of Justice */

2017-06-11T09:38:33Z

Definition of Justice

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 Justice may appear only when contradictory wishes are involved and the undifferentiated consciousness is unable to comply with the paradoxon.
-The purpose of justice is to maximize the instantiation of the wishes of monads.
+The purpose of justice is to maximize the instantiation of the wishes of monads, hence, to maximize the imidiateness of the wishes.
 Three aspects of justice may be distinguished.
@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 Note: If the discrepancy of the wishes of the other monads goes near 0, the wish of the monad is manifested quickly because the imidiateness of the wish equals the respective wish. The more monads wish the same thing, the faster it is instantiated. The lower the discrepancy, the fast it is possible for the respective wishes to instantiate.--[[User:Aim|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Aim at 08:56, 11 June 2017

2017-06-11T08:56:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 11 June 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== Correlation to Justice ==		== Correlation to Justice ==

	There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of chance, time and space are all a consequence of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same ''priority'' concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another. The solution to this problem is the basic rule, energy follows intent. The impossibility for undifferentiated consciousness to conform with this rule creates the dimensions of chance, time and space.		There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of chance, time and space are all a consequence of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same ''priority'' concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another. The solution to this problem is the basic rule, energy follows intent. According to the BOLVI, there is another rule involved here: Energy follows intent ''instantly and literally''. The impossibility for undifferentiated consciousness to conform with this second rule creates the dimensions of chance, time and space.

	--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 21:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
			--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 08:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


Line 27:		Line 28:


	tentative definition of Justice: Justice is the system that enables the instantiation of incompatible wishes of different monads as sure (minimizing chance), as fast (minimizing duration) , and as spatially imidiate (minimizing space) as possible.		tentative definition of Justice:

			Justice is the system that enables the instantiation of incompatible wishes of different monads as sure (minimizing chance), as fast (minimizing duration) , and as spatially imidiate (minimizing space) as possible. For this reason, the tree of lights is shaped in a specific order, maximizing the common usage of mana, while allowing for a maximum of diversity at the same time.

			Justice may appear only when contradictory wishes are involved and the undifferentiated consciousness is unable to comply with the paradoxon.
			The purpose of justice is to maximize the instantiation of the wishes of monads.
			Three aspects of justice may be distinguished.

			1) the avoidance of the paradoxon. (justice for the entire fabric of consciousness)
			2) if a paradoxon occurs, the instantiation of the differing wishes as safe, fast and imidiate as possible. (justice for this group of monads in relation to the rest of the fabric of consciousness)
			3) the equality of burden. --> no priority of any monad over another monad. (justice between specific monads)--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 08:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

	tentative description of Justice via a formula:		tentative description of Justice via a formula:

Aim at 21:07, 10 June 2017

2017-06-10T21:07:42Z

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
-It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.
+It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of the dimension of chance, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by chance. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.
 --[[User:Aim|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 == Correlation to Justice ==
-There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. Although this seems odd at first sight, but a look at the functional purposes of the dimensions shows that it's not that far of a fetch: As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of parallelism, time and space all solve the problem of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same ''priority'' concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another.
+There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of chance, time and space are all a consequence of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same ''priority'' concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another. The solution to this problem is the basic rule, energy follows intent. The impossibility for undifferentiated consciousness to conform with this rule creates the dimensions of chance, time and space.

Aim: /* Entanglement of Dimensions */

2017-06-10T19:47:02Z

Entanglement of Dimensions

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 10 June 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	== Entanglement of Dimensions ==		== Entanglement of Dimensions ==




	~~Because Reality is nothing but the mirror of the ideas/archetypes of spirit, it suggests itself that the same applies also to the dimensions from the third fundamental view of creation.~~


Line 18:		Line 13:
	It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.		It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.
	--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)		--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)








	== Correlation to Justice ==		== Correlation to Justice ==

Aim at 19:09, 10 June 2017

2017-06-10T19:09:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 10 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Spacetime has been mathematically described by Minkowski and was a necessary step to explain/understand the postulates of Special Relativity. See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space		The Spacetime has been mathematically described by Minkowski and was a necessary step to explain/understand the postulates of Special Relativity. See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


Line 16:		Line 16:


	It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.		It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.
			--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


Line 29:		Line 29:

	There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. Although this seems odd at first sight, but a look at the functional purposes of the dimensions shows that it's not that far of a fetch: As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of parallelism, time and space all solve the problem of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same ''priority'' concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another.		There seems to be a strong correlation of the dimensions with the idea of justice. Although this seems odd at first sight, but a look at the functional purposes of the dimensions shows that it's not that far of a fetch: As the first monads have been created, the dimension of perspective has emerged. All monads have been created equal in the mind of God and all the intrinsic abilities have been copied as well. The undifferentiated consciousness now obeyed different sources (monads). The instantiation of new monads had huge implications on the way creation worked. Because monads now had (different) perspectives, this also means they could have different wishes. As each and every monad has been created as a (perfect) reflection of God, one tiny problem arose. What happens actually if two monads wish for mutually incompatible things? Well, since the wishes of every monad are instantiated instantly and the possibility of contradiction arose due to the instantiation of monads with different perspectives, we certainly had a problem. The aforementioned dimensions of parallelism, time and space all solve the problem of conflicting wishes. The question at hand is: How can we make the system of our playground totally "fair" for each and every monad? All monads are equally important, all monads have an equal say in creation, hence all monads should have the same ''priority'' concerning the instantiation of reality. According to this train of thoughts, justice could be described as the system which takes care that the priority of wishes is always equal. No monad should have its' wishes prioritized over another, because no monad is more "important" than another.
	The solution to this problem works via dimensions: Parallelism, time, space. The dimension of parallelism is very similar to those of time and space. All three dimensions create what might be called "''order''" , or simultaneous realization of conflicting (which is to say not identical) wishes.(I have to say that i'm always amazed by the heuristic abilities of spirit..)		The solution to this problem works via dimensions: Parallelism, time, space. The dimension of parallelism is very similar to those of time and space. All three dimensions create what might be called "''order''" , or simultaneous realization of conflicting (which is to say not identical) wishes.(I have to say that i'm always amazed by the heuristic abilities of spirit..)
			--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


Line 38:		Line 38:
	== Time ==		== Time ==

	The dimension of time solves the problem by the creation of temporal "distance". The realization of two conflicting wishes is done ''one after the other''. The duration for one wish to be instantiated depends on the discrepancy between said wish and the wish of other monads "in the vicinity". This dimension creates a temporal order.		The dimension of time solves the problem by the creation of temporal "distance". The realization of two conflicting wishes is done ''one after the other''. The duration for one wish to be instantiated depends on the discrepancy between said wish and the wish of other monads "in the vicinity". This dimension creates a temporal order.
			--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

	== Space ==		== Space ==

	The dimension of space solves the problem by the creation of spacial distance. The realization of two conflicting wishes is done ''one next to each other''. The spatial distance from one wish to another depends on the discrepancy between said wish and those of other monads "in the vicinity". This dimension creates a spatial order.		The dimension of space solves the problem by the creation of spacial distance. The realization of two conflicting wishes is done ''one next to each other''. The spatial distance from one wish to another depends on the discrepancy between said wish and those of other monads "in the vicinity". This dimension creates a spatial order.--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


Line 75:		Line 75:
	if the right side of the equation is negative, time, space and chance must be applied.		if the right side of the equation is negative, time, space and chance must be applied.

	Note: If the discrepancy of the wishes of the other monads goes near 0, the wish of the monad is manifested quickly because the imidiateness of the wish equals the respective wish. The more monads wish the same thing, the faster it is instantiated. The lower the discrepancy, the fast it is possible for the respective wishes to instantiate.		Note: If the discrepancy of the wishes of the other monads goes near 0, the wish of the monad is manifested quickly because the imidiateness of the wish equals the respective wish. The more monads wish the same thing, the faster it is instantiated. The lower the discrepancy, the fast it is possible for the respective wishes to instantiate.--[[User:Aim\|Aim]] ([[User talk:Aim\|talk]]) 19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


	----
	~~thx~~ :)

Aim at 11:56, 14 May 2017

2017-05-14T11:56:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 14 May 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:


	~~== '''The five primary dimensions''' ==~~

	~~According to the Book of Light Vol.I, there are 5 primary Dimensions in the [[First Creation]]: perspective, detail, chance, time, and space.~~



	~~== Perspective ==~~


	~~== Detail ==~~

	The dimension of detail seems to be no dimension at all, at least as framed by our "modern" understanding of existence. It is interesting though to point out that the dimension of detail seems to be setting ''boundaries'' for awareness by putting everything into relation with each other. If a monad is focusing on a specific issue, it will direct its attention towards the issue. Other information are fading out, yet the richness of the information is constant. The more detail is perceived, the less focus can be directed towards the bigger picture. The further away something is from us, the more we can observe how it is embedded into the relation of all other things - we see the big picture. The closer it is, the less we will be able to notice its' relationship with other things, but we will notice the surface area, the texture, the form, heat, all properties of the object - which in turn leads to the understanding of inner relationships. If we compare the two "perspectives" - the close one and the far one - it seems to be plausible to say that the amount of information we get is equal in both cases. This seems to be consistent with the idea that consciousness cannot be created nor destroyed. Since awareness is a primary trait of (differentiated) consciousness, and consciousness can't be created nor destroyed, it follows that the amount of awareness is also constant. Hence, the amount of available attention can't fluctuate. If the dimension of detail was missing, and a monad would want to inspect some part of creation more closely, then this would mean that it would have to lower its awareness, because the amount of information would be less. Due to the dimension of detail, this problem gets circumvented.

	== Entanglement of Dimensions ==		== Entanglement of Dimensions ==
Line 25:		Line 16:


	It is noteworthy that the dimensions of ~~potentiality~~, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of ~~potentiality~~, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.		It is noteworthy that the dimensions of chance, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of chance, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.


Line 41:		Line 32:


	~~== Parallelism ==~~

	The dimension of parallelism solves the problem by the creation of parallel alternatives. Say two monads wish for mutually incompatible things. Both intend an outcome. The dimension of parallelism allows the creation of both alternatives by separating them into two different "worlds". The wishes have been parallelized. With the existance of this "parallelizing dimension" both wishes can be instantiated.
	~~This dimension creates what might be called "potential order". It sets the alternatives in relation to each other.~~
	I propose the creation of the term ''"potential distance"''. The potential distance is the difference in the specific wishes. Say we have 10 different wishes, then we could sort the wishes by their varying degree of alikeness. Depending on how big the difference of the ten (or more) wishes is, the "potential distance" might be bigger or smaller. This dimension is absolutely necessary for the emergence of potentiality, which is why the term "parallelity" seems useful. This dimension creates a potential order.


Line 73:		Line 60:


	In 3FV perspective, we experience the dimensions as one alternative at one point in time in one location in space~~. Chance is the experience of changing among alternatives, time is the experience of changing from point in time to another, space is the experience of changing from one location to another.~~		In 3FV perspective, we experience the dimensions as one alternative at one point in time in one location in space.

	~~== The Space-Time-Potentiality Tube ==~~


	The Space-Time Tube might be extended by Potentiality. One might picture this as a three-dimensional tube, (exactly as before) with the x-axis being the space, the y-axis the potentialities and the z-axis the time.

	~~There is a link to Concurrent Lives here. explore~~.

Aim at 18:48, 10 May 2017

2017-05-10T18:48:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 10 May 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:


			== '''The five primary dimensions''' ==

			According to the Book of Light Vol.I, there are 5 primary Dimensions in the [[First Creation]]: perspective, detail, chance, time, and space.



			== Perspective ==


			== Detail ==

			The dimension of detail seems to be no dimension at all, at least as framed by our "modern" understanding of existence. It is interesting though to point out that the dimension of detail seems to be setting ''boundaries'' for awareness by putting everything into relation with each other. If a monad is focusing on a specific issue, it will direct its attention towards the issue. Other information are fading out, yet the richness of the information is constant. The more detail is perceived, the less focus can be directed towards the bigger picture. The further away something is from us, the more we can observe how it is embedded into the relation of all other things - we see the big picture. The closer it is, the less we will be able to notice its' relationship with other things, but we will notice the surface area, the texture, the form, heat, all properties of the object - which in turn leads to the understanding of inner relationships. If we compare the two "perspectives" - the close one and the far one - it seems to be plausible to say that the amount of information we get is equal in both cases. This seems to be consistent with the idea that consciousness cannot be created nor destroyed. Since awareness is a primary trait of (differentiated) consciousness, and consciousness can't be created nor destroyed, it follows that the amount of awareness is also constant. Hence, the amount of available attention can't fluctuate. If the dimension of detail was missing, and a monad would want to inspect some part of creation more closely, then this would mean that it would have to lower its awareness, because the amount of information would be less. Due to the dimension of detail, this problem gets circumvented.

	== Entanglement of Dimensions ==		== Entanglement of Dimensions ==


	~~According to the Book of Light Vol.I, there are 5 primary Dimensions in the [[First Creation]]: perspective, detail, chance, time, and space.~~

	Because Reality is nothing but the mirror of the ideas/archetypes of spirit, it suggests itself that the same applies also to the dimensions from the third fundamental view of creation.		Because Reality is nothing but the mirror of the ideas/archetypes of spirit, it suggests itself that the same applies also to the dimensions from the third fundamental view of creation.

	~~For the following discussion, I propose the dimension of "chance" to be renamed as the dimension of potentiality or parallelism.~~

	It is noteworthy that the dimensions of potentiality, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of potentiality, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.		It is noteworthy that the dimensions of potentiality, time and space all seem to have the exact same functional purpose. According to the BoLVI, the emergence of dimensions occured as a consequence of the addition of new monads. Starting from the dimension of potentiality, the manifestations of one monad would interfere with the manifestations of another monad.(due to the number) With the emergence of potentiality, the outcome of two incompatible wishes of two monads is solved by the creation of alternatives. The dimension of time solves the same problem: two incompatible wishes are granted ''one after the other'' , so that the incompatibility gets circumvented. The same works for space as well: Spatial extension of the Canvas of Reality has emerged which enables incompatible wishes of Monads to be instantiated ''without the necessity of chance to solve the issue, or the necessity to wait''. One could notice here, that the different dimensions are intervowen, because they help each other out concerning the aim of equally instantiating the wishes of the Monads.