Humanistic Psychology - Revision history

Michael at 15:22, 8 January 2026

2026-01-08T15:22:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 8 January 2026
Line 115:		Line 115:
	{{template:endstuff}}		{{template:endstuff}}
	[[category:terms]]		[[category:terms]]
			[[Is a key term::Eupsychia\| ]]
	[[Is a::psy-peacetable component\| ]]		[[Is a::psy-peacetable component\| ]]
	[[Has peace sort::5\| ]]		[[Has peace sort::5\| ]]
	[[Is a related term::Transpersonal Psychology\| ]]		[[Is a related term::Transpersonal Psychology\| ]]
	~~[[Is a related term::Eupsychia\| ]]~~
	[[Is a term::Abraham Maslow\| ]]		[[Is a term::Abraham Maslow\| ]]
	~~[[Is a key term::Eupsychia\| ]]~~

Michael at 19:54, 2 January 2026

2026-01-02T19:54:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 2 January 2026
Line 52:		Line 52:
	'''3. The Assumption of Pluralism and Individual Differences.'''		'''3. The Assumption of Pluralism and Individual Differences.'''

	Maslow argued for the strong acceptance of hereditary, constitutional, and temperamental differences among people.		Maslow argued for the strong acceptance of hereditary, constitutional, and temperamental differences among people. This was not in a "some people are just better" way but in a "everybody is different" sort of way. <blockquote>It can be emphasized that the whole humanistic synthesis resembles a smorgasbord: a big table offering all sorts of ways of life. In this manner, people could choose the particular paths that they find appealing and that resonate with their unique interests, perceptions, and tastes. Thus, art as a path toward self-actualization would not work for everyone. It would leave some persons cold, but it would certainly be effective for those who are aesthetically sensitive or inclined. The same principle would hold true for music or for the mesomorphic way of body athletics such as dancing. After all, there are many Being-values, and anyone can enter into the Being-realm via any single one of these--whether beauty, truth, virtue, perfection, or whatever if it might be.<ref>Maslow, Abraham H. “The Unnoticed Psychological Revolution.” In ''Future Visions: The Unpublished Papers of Abraham Maslow'', edited by Edward Hoffman. Sage Publications, 1996. p. 125.</ref> </blockquote>''We're all different, we all have different talents, and that's a good thing.'' ''Difference is good thing. Beyond basic hunter-gatherer levels of technology, difference is required for survival of the human species. The more advanced a species becomes, the more difference is required. Rather, this should lead us towards what Maslow called the [[Horticultural Model]] (as opposed to the [[Sculpture Model]], of human development''—''helping a rose become a good rose rather than trying to change it into a lily." Maslow said this implies a Taoistic "acceptance of what people really are; it necessitates a pleasure in the self-actualization of a person who may be quite different from yourself. It even implies an ultimate respect and acknowledgement of the sacredness and uniqueness of each kind of person." (p. 27). Strong words!''

	~~''Although Maslow, unfortunately, fall heavily~~ in ~~this direction near~~ the ~~end~~ of ~~his~~ life, ~~this should~~ not be ~~seen~~ as ~~leading towards eugenics~~. Difference is good thing. Beyond basic hunter-gatherer levels of technology, difference is required for survival of the human species. The more advanced a species becomes, the more difference is required. Rather, this should lead us towards what Maslow called the [[Horticultural Model]] (as opposed to the [[Sculpture Model]], of human development''—''helping a rose become a good rose rather than trying to change it into a lily." Maslow said this implies a Taoistic "acceptance of what people really are; it necessitates a pleasure in the self-actualization of a person who may be quite different from yourself. It even implies an ultimate respect and acknowledgement of the sacredness and ~~uniquness~~ of each kind of person." (p. 27). Strong words!''

	'''4. The Assumption of Cross-Cultural Values.'''		'''4. The Assumption of Cross-Cultural Values.'''

Michael at 15:13, 2 January 2026

2026-01-02T15:13:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 2 January 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	== Concept Map ==		== Concept Map ==
			=== Key Terms ===

	~~=== Key Terms===~~
	[[Eupsychia]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Eupsychia]]\|format=ul}}		[[Eupsychia]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Eupsychia]]\|format=ul}}

	=~~== Peace Table Components ===~~		[[Humanistic Psychology]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Humanistic Psychology]]\|format=ul}}

			===Three Pillars of Eupsychian Psychology===
	{{#ask:[[Is a::psy-peacetable component]]\|format=ul\|sort=Has peace sort}}		{{#ask:[[Is a::psy-peacetable component]]\|format=ul\|sort=Has peace sort}}

	~~[[Humanistic Psychology]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Humanistic Psychology]]\|format=ul}}~~

	==Notes==		==Notes==

Line 124:		Line 122:
	[[Is a related term::Eupsychia\| ]]		[[Is a related term::Eupsychia\| ]]
	[[Is a term::Abraham Maslow\| ]]		[[Is a term::Abraham Maslow\| ]]
			[[Is a key term::Eupsychia\| ]]

Michael at 15:04, 2 January 2026

2026-01-02T15:04:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 2 January 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:

	=== Key Terms===		=== Key Terms===
			[[Eupsychia]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Eupsychia]]\|format=ul}}

	~~[[Humanistic Psychology]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Humanistic Psychology]]\|format~~=~~ul}}~~		=== Peace Table Components ===

	==~~= The Three Pillars of Peace ===~~		{{#ask:[[Is a::psy-peacetable component]]\|format=ul\|sort=Has peace sort}}

	{{#ask:[[Is a::~~psy-peacetable component~~]]\|format=ul~~\|sort=Has peace sort~~}}		[[Humanistic Psychology]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Humanistic Psychology]]\|format=ul}}

	==Notes==		==Notes==
Line 80:		Line 81:
	Scientific investigation requires a lot of methodological choices which may be rooted in personal bias. Maslow points out that it is important to your trust intuition and that "science is really a division of labour and a collaboration" and others will come along and check the work and address any biases. Intuition here is important not as a final arbiter of truth but as a source of thought, an inspiration to research, and an invitation to empirical verification.<ref name=":0" />		Scientific investigation requires a lot of methodological choices which may be rooted in personal bias. Maslow points out that it is important to your trust intuition and that "science is really a division of labour and a collaboration" and others will come along and check the work and address any biases. Intuition here is important not as a final arbiter of truth but as a source of thought, an inspiration to research, and an invitation to empirical verification.<ref name=":0" />

	==== 9. The reality of the "~~diminished~~ Human Being." ====		==== 9. The reality of the "[[Diminished Human Being]]." ====
	The reality is people are diminished<ref>For the LP's theoretical take, see the [[5Ds of Toxic Existence]], disconnection, diminishment, dysfunction, disease, and death.</ref> and it is this diminishment<ref>And not existential notions of "evil," for example. </ref> that explains why people do bad things (p. 31). "I suppose that it may be necessary to accept the fact that the ultimate [[B-Values\|Being-Values]] are those chosen not simply by 'reasonably good specimens but by the best specimens of the human species." (p. 31).		The reality is people are diminished<ref>For the LP's theoretical take, see the [[5Ds of Toxic Existence]], disconnection, diminishment, dysfunction, disease, and death.</ref> and it is this diminishment<ref>And not existential notions of "evil," for example. </ref> that explains why people do bad things (p. 31). "I suppose that it may be necessary to accept the fact that the ultimate [[B-Values\|Being-Values]] are those chosen not simply by 'reasonably good specimens but by the best specimens of the human species." (p. 31).

Michael at 16:53, 1 January 2026

2026-01-01T16:53:51Z

Show changes

Michael at 16:30, 31 December 2025

2025-12-31T16:30:58Z

Show changes

Michael at 15:11, 31 December 2025

2025-12-31T15:11:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 31 December 2025
Line 21:		Line 21:
	=== Peace Table Components ===		=== Peace Table Components ===

	{{#ask:[[Is a psy-peacetable component]]\|format=ul\|sort=Has peace sort}}		{{#ask:[[Is a::psy-peacetable component]]\|format=ul\|sort=Has peace sort}}

	==Notes==		==Notes==
Line 71:		Line 71:
	{{template:endstuff}}		{{template:endstuff}}
	[[category:terms]]		[[category:terms]]
	[[Is a psy-peacetable component\| ]]		[[Is a::psy-peacetable component\| ]]
	[[Has peace sort::5\| ]]		[[Has peace sort::5\| ]]

Michael at 15:07, 31 December 2025

2025-12-31T15:07:24Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 By 1969 the movement naturally extended into [[Transpersonal Psychology]], where we found scientific examination of the transpersonal aspects of [[Human Nature]].
-Humanistic psychology is therefore not merely a clinical orientation but a moral-scientific project to re-found civilization on an empirically grounded, dignity-affirming image of Homo sapiens at its most fully human.
+Humanistic psychology was ultimately part of a scientific project designed to re-build civilization on an empirically grounded, dignity-affirming image of Homo sapiens at its most fully human.
 </blockquote>
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 [[Humanistic Psychology]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Humanistic Psychology]]|format=ul}}
 ==Notes==
@@ Line 28: / Line 32: @@
 I had a vision of a peace table, with people sitting around it, talking about human nature and hatred and war and peace and brotherhood. I was too old to go into the army. It was at that moment that I realized that the rest of my life must be devoted to discovering a psychology for the peace table. That moment changed my whole life.<ref>Edward Hoffman, The Right to Be Human: A Biography of Abraham Maslow (New York: McGraw Hill, 1999), p. 148-9.</ref></blockquote>
 === Maslow's Revolution ===
@@ Line 47: / Line 70: @@
 {{template:endstuff}}
 [[category:terms]]
 [[Is a related term::Transpersonal Psychology| ]]

Michael at 16:23, 30 December 2025

2025-12-30T16:23:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 30 December 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>		<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>
	<blockquote class="definition">		<blockquote class="definition">
	Humanistic Psychology emerged in the 1950s–60s as the “third force” in psychology, a deliberate break from behaviorism’s mechanistic control model and psychoanalysis’s pathology fixation. Its origin is inseparable from Abraham Maslow’s post-Pearl Harbor vow to create “a psychology for the peace table”—a science of human nature that could make war obsolete by fostering mutual understanding and self-actualizing persons.<ref>Sosteric, Mike. “Abraham Maslow’s Vision for a Psychology of the Peace Table.” ''The Peace Table'', 2025. https://medium.com/the-peace-table.</ref> At its core, the movement insists that humanity supersedes the sum of his parts<ref>Bugental, J. F. “The Third Force in Psychology." ''Journal of Humanistic Psychology.'' Journal of Humanistic Psychology 4, no. 1 (1964): 19–26.</ref> and lives with intentionality—creating values, not merely seeking homeostatic satisfaction.<ref>Charlotte Buhler, “The Scope of Humanistic Psychology.,” ''Education'' 95, no. 1 (January 1, 1974): 2–8.</ref> Rejecting eight entrenched parameters from part-function models to statistical frequency as truth, humanistic psychologists championed phenomenological methods, authentic therapeutic encounter, and peak-experience analysis (Maslow’s B-cognition). The field was institutionalized with the Journal of Humanistic Psychology (1961) and the American Association for Humanistic Psychology (1962)~~, forging~~ a research program on self-actualization, B-~~values~~ (truth, goodness, beauty, justice, play, etc.), and ~~synergy—social~~ conditions that fuse selfish and altruistic aims. Philosophically, it revived an Aristotelian essentialism;<ref>Robb, “The Hidden Philosophical Agenda: A Commentary on Humanistic Psychology.”</ref> humanity has an intrinsic nature whose fulfillment is the proper end of life, a doctrine that grounds ~~its normative~~ claim that frustration of ~~metaneeds~~ generates violence, while their gratification builds [[Eupsychia]], a peaceful, psychologically healthy society. By 1969 the movement naturally extended into Transpersonal Psychology, ~~studying transcendent states without abandoning empirical, experiential validation~~. Humanistic psychology is therefore not merely a clinical orientation but a moral-scientific project to re-found civilization on an empirically grounded, dignity-affirming image of Homo sapiens at its most fully human.		Humanistic Psychology (HP) emerged in the 1950s–60s as the “third force” in psychology, a deliberate break from behaviorism’s mechanistic control model and psychoanalysis’s pathology fixation. Its origin is inseparable from Abraham Maslow’s post-Pearl Harbor vow to create “a psychology for the peace table”—a science of human nature that could make war obsolete by fostering mutual understanding and self-actualizing persons.<ref>Sosteric, Mike. “Abraham Maslow’s Vision for a Psychology of the Peace Table.” ''The Peace Table'', 2025. https://medium.com/the-peace-table.</ref> At its core, the movement insists that humanity supersedes the sum of his parts<ref>Bugental, J. F. “The Third Force in Psychology." ''Journal of Humanistic Psychology.'' Journal of Humanistic Psychology 4, no. 1 (1964): 19–26.</ref> and lives with intentionality—creating values, not merely seeking homeostatic satisfaction.<ref>Charlotte Buhler, “The Scope of Humanistic Psychology.,” ''Education'' 95, no. 1 (January 1, 1974): 2–8.</ref>

			The field was institutionalized with the [[Journal of Humanistic Psychology]] (1961) and the [[American Association for Humanistic Psychology]] (1962). They forged a research program on self-actualization, [[B-Values]] (truth, goodness, beauty, justice, play, etc.), and "synergy," i.e., a social conditions that would fuse selfish and altruistic aims, thereby providing the foundations for what Maslow called the [[Good Society]]... [[Eupsychia]], also known [[Zion]] (Rastafari), the "New Age" of Aquarius (New Age), Heaven on Earth (Christian), Shambhala (Tibetan), or, most recently, the [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4955642/ Good Place].<ref>Which, in a "funny Hollywood twist haha," was really just a poorly implemented bad place. </ref>

			Philosophically, it revived an Aristotelian essentialism;<ref>Robb, “The Hidden Philosophical Agenda: A Commentary on Humanistic Psychology.”</ref> humanity has an intrinsic nature whose fulfillment is the proper end of life, a doctrine that grounds HP's claim that frustration of needs generates violence, while their gratification builds [[Eupsychia]], a peaceful, psychologically healthy society.

			By 1969 the movement naturally extended into [[Transpersonal Psychology]], where we found scientific examination of the transpersonal aspects of [[Human Nature]].

			Humanistic psychology is therefore not merely a clinical orientation but a moral-scientific project to re-found civilization on an empirically grounded, dignity-affirming image of Homo sapiens at its most fully human.
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

Line 10:		Line 18:

	[[Humanistic Psychology]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Humanistic Psychology]]\|format=ul}}		[[Humanistic Psychology]] > {{#ask:[[Is a key term::Humanistic Psychology]]\|format=ul}}


	==Notes==		==Notes==
	Humanistic Psychology was meant to be revolution. Those that participated in the early days were clear on this. The goal was to create an entirely new foundation for scholarly activity, a new revolution in our understanding of humanity as deep and wide as that provided by the Copernican Revolution.<ref>Willis W. Harman, “The New Copernican Revolution,” ''Stanford Today'' Winter Series II, no. 1 (1969): 127–34.</ref>

	Ultimately, the revolution failed not because of internal problems but because it was a threat to the status-quo. Ekins<ref>David Elkins, “Why Humanistic Psychology Lost Its Power and Influence in American Psychology,” ''Journal of Humanistic Psychology'' 49, no. 1 (2009): 267–91.</ref> suggests it was murdered, as a result.

	~~===Maslow's Vision===~~

	Maslow's vision for a ''Psychology of the Peace Table'', ~~experienced shortly~~ after ~~the US entry into WWII~~, changed the course of Maslow's life and drove him to ~~help~~ create [[Humanistic Psychology]] and [[Transpersonal Psychology]], both of which formed the theoretical foundations for a [[Eupsychian Psychology]] devoted to creating the [[Good Person]] and the [[Good Society]].		=== Maslow's Vision ===
			Humanistic Psychology was meant to be revolution. Those that participated in the early days were clear on this. The goal was to create an entirely new foundation for scholarly activity, a new revolution in our understanding of humanity as deep and wide as that provided by the Copernican Revolution.<ref>Willis W. Harman, “The New Copernican Revolution,” ''Stanford Today'' Winter Series II, no. 1 (1969): 127–34.</ref> Maslow was a big part of that effort, maybe even an initiating factor. His whole research program beyond 1941 was devoted to bringing about a revolution. We know this because of Maslow's 1941 vision for a ''Psychology of the Peace Table''!<ref>Sosteric, Mike. “Abraham Maslow’s Vision for a Psychology of the Peace Table.” ''The Peace Table'', 2025. <nowiki>https://medium.com/the-peace-table</nowiki>.</ref> Experienced the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, it changed the course of Maslow's life and drove him to create [[Humanistic Psychology]] and [[Transpersonal Psychology]], both of which I would argue formed the theoretical foundations (humanistic view of [[Human Nature]],<ref>Maslow, Abraham H. “Science, Psychology, and the Existential Outlook.” In ''Future Visions: The Unpublished Papers of Abraham Maslow'', edited by Edward Hoffman, 115–19. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.</ref> Transpersonal view of [[Human Potential]], for a [[Eupsychian Psychology]] devoted to creating the [[Good Person]] and the [[Good Society]].<ref>Maslow, Abraham H. “Eupsychia—The Good Society.” ''Journal of Humanistic Psychology'' 1, no. 2 (1961): 1.</ref> A textual representation of his vision is reproduced below.

	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
Line 25:		Line 28:

	I had a vision of a peace table, with people sitting around it, talking about human nature and hatred and war and peace and brotherhood. I was too old to go into the army. It was at that moment that I realized that the rest of my life must be devoted to discovering a psychology for the peace table. That moment changed my whole life.<ref>Edward Hoffman, The Right to Be Human: A Biography of Abraham Maslow (New York: McGraw Hill, 1999), p. 148-9.</ref></blockquote>		I had a vision of a peace table, with people sitting around it, talking about human nature and hatred and war and peace and brotherhood. I was too old to go into the army. It was at that moment that I realized that the rest of my life must be devoted to discovering a psychology for the peace table. That moment changed my whole life.<ref>Edward Hoffman, The Right to Be Human: A Biography of Abraham Maslow (New York: McGraw Hill, 1999), p. 148-9.</ref></blockquote>

			=== Maslow's Revolution ===
			Ultimately, the revolution failed, but not because of internal problems, but because it was murdered.<ref>David Elkins, “Why Humanistic Psychology Lost Its Power and Influence in American Psychology,” ''Journal of Humanistic Psychology'' 49, no. 1 (2009): 267–91.</ref> It was murdered because it was a threat to the status quo in America and elsewhere. Proponents were talking about revolutionary new ways of seeing humans with revolutionary new potentials to unfold.

			promised to heal and awaken, and because it was a credible threat to the

			[[Accumulating Class]].

			===Maslow's Vision===

			Maslow's

	==Quotes==		==Quotes==

Michael at 16:20, 21 December 2025

2025-12-21T16:20:25Z

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>
 <blockquote class="definition">
-Humanistic Psychology emerged in the 1950s–60s as the “third force” in psychology, a deliberate break from behaviorism’s mechanistic control model and psychoanalysis’s pathology fixation. Its origin is inseparable from Abraham Maslow’s post-Pearl Harbor vow to create “a psychology for the peace table”—a science of human nature that could make war obsolete by fostering mutual understanding and self-actualizing persons. At its core, the movement insists that humanity supersedes the sum of his parts (Bugental, 1964) and lives with intentionality—creating values, not merely seeking homeostatic satisfaction.<ref>Charlotte Buhler, “The Scope of Humanistic Psychology.,” ''Education'' 95, no. 1 (January 1, 1974): 2–8.</ref> Rejecting eight entrenched parameters from part-function models to statistical frequency as truth, humanistic psychologists championed phenomenological methods, authentic therapeutic encounter, and peak-experience analysis (Maslow’s B-cognition). The field was institutionalized with the Journal of Humanistic Psychology (1961) and the American Association for Humanistic Psychology (1962), forging a research program on self-actualization, B-values (truth, goodness, beauty, justice, play, etc.), and synergy—social conditions that fuse selfish and altruistic aims. Philosophically, it revived an Aristotelian essentialism;<ref>Robb, “The Hidden Philosophical Agenda: A Commentary on Humanistic Psychology.”</ref> humanity has an intrinsic nature whose fulfillment is the proper end of life, a doctrine that grounds its normative claim that frustration of metaneeds generates violence, while their gratification builds [[Eupsychia]], a peaceful, psychologically healthy society. By 1969 the movement naturally extended into Transpersonal Psychology, studying transcendent states without abandoning empirical, experiential validation. Humanistic psychology is therefore not merely a clinical orientation but a moral-scientific project to re-found civilization on an empirically grounded, dignity-affirming image of Homo sapiens at its most fully human.
+Humanistic Psychology emerged in the 1950s–60s as the “third force” in psychology, a deliberate break from behaviorism’s mechanistic control model and psychoanalysis’s pathology fixation. Its origin is inseparable from Abraham Maslow’s post-Pearl Harbor vow to create “a psychology for the peace table”—a science of human nature that could make war obsolete by fostering mutual understanding and self-actualizing persons.<ref>Sosteric, Mike. “Abraham Maslow’s Vision for a Psychology of the Peace Table.” ''The Peace Table'', 2025. https://medium.com/the-peace-table.</ref> At its core, the movement insists that humanity supersedes the sum of his parts<ref>Bugental, J. F. “The Third Force in Psychology." ''Journal of Humanistic Psychology.'' Journal of Humanistic Psychology 4, no. 1 (1964): 19–26.</ref> and lives with intentionality—creating values, not merely seeking homeostatic satisfaction.<ref>Charlotte Buhler, “The Scope of Humanistic Psychology.,” ''Education'' 95, no. 1 (January 1, 1974): 2–8.</ref> Rejecting eight entrenched parameters from part-function models to statistical frequency as truth, humanistic psychologists championed phenomenological methods, authentic therapeutic encounter, and peak-experience analysis (Maslow’s B-cognition). The field was institutionalized with the Journal of Humanistic Psychology (1961) and the American Association for Humanistic Psychology (1962), forging a research program on self-actualization, B-values (truth, goodness, beauty, justice, play, etc.), and synergy—social conditions that fuse selfish and altruistic aims. Philosophically, it revived an Aristotelian essentialism;<ref>Robb, “The Hidden Philosophical Agenda: A Commentary on Humanistic Psychology.”</ref> humanity has an intrinsic nature whose fulfillment is the proper end of life, a doctrine that grounds its normative claim that frustration of metaneeds generates violence, while their gratification builds [[Eupsychia]], a peaceful, psychologically healthy society. By 1969 the movement naturally extended into Transpersonal Psychology, studying transcendent states without abandoning empirical, experiential validation. Humanistic psychology is therefore not merely a clinical orientation but a moral-scientific project to re-found civilization on an empirically grounded, dignity-affirming image of Homo sapiens at its most fully human.
 </blockquote>
-==Concept Map==
+== Concept Map ==
-===Abraham Maslow Terms===
+=== Key Terms===
-[[Abraham Maslow]] >
 ==Notes==
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Ultimately, the revolution failed not because of internal problems but because it was a threat to the status-quo. Ekins<ref>David Elkins, “Why Humanistic Psychology Lost Its Power and Influence in American Psychology,” ''Journal of Humanistic Psychology'' 49, no. 1 (2009): 267–91.</ref> suggests it was murdered, as a result.
-===Institutional Timeline===
+===Maslow's Vision===
-    Humanity [man, originally], as such, supersedes the sum of his parts.
+Maslow's vision for a ''Psychology of the Peace Table'', experienced shortly after the US entry into WWII, changed the course of Maslow's life and drove him to help create [[Humanistic Psychology]] and [[Transpersonal Psychology]], both of which formed the theoretical foundations for a [[Eupsychian Psychology]] devoted to creating the [[Good Person]] and the [[Good Society]].
 <blockquote>
 One day just after Pearl Harbor, I was driving home and my car was stopped by a poor, pathetic parade. Boy Scouts and fat people and old uniforms and a flag and someone playing a flute off-key. As I watched, the tears began to run down my face. I felt we didn’t understand—not Hitler, nor the Germans, nor Stalin, nor the Communists. We didn’t understand any of them. I felt that if we could understand, then we could make progress
@@ Line 75: / Line 27: @@
 ==Quotes==
 {{template:endstuff}}
@@ Line 81: / Line 37: @@
 [[Is a related term::Transpersonal Psychology| ]]
 [[Is a term::Abraham Maslow| ]]