Emile Durkheim - Revision history

Michael at 00:02, 23 December 2022

2022-12-23T00:02:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 23 December 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:

	[[category:terms]]		[[category:terms]]
	~~[[category:lightningpath]]~~
	[[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]]		[[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]]
	[[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]]		[[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]]
	[[category:todo]]		[[category:todo]]

216.244.66.195: Text replacement - "]]" to " [["

2022-12-19T05:49:24Z

Text replacement - "]]" to " [["

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:49, 19 December 2022
Line 24:		Line 24:
	{{endstuff}}		{{endstuff}}

	[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]][[category:todo]]		[[category:terms]]
			[[category:lightningpath]]
			[[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]]
			[[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]]
			[[category:todo]]

Michael at 03:06, 9 July 2021

2021-07-09T03:06:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 9 July 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. p. 71. </ref>		Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. p. 71. </ref>

	Did not attack ~~religion~~ and believed it played an essential role as projection of society.		Did not attack [[Religion]] and believed it played an essential role as projection of society.

	"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements."<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 9.</ref>		"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements."<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 9.</ref>

Michael: /* Notes */

2021-07-09T03:05:05Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 9 July 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:

	"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements."<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 9.</ref>		"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements."<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 9.</ref>

			Suggested religion consisted of two elements, beliefs and rites. "Religious phenomena fall into two basic categories: beliefs and rites. The first are states of opinion and consist of representations; the second are particular modes of action. Between these two categories of phenomena lies all that separates thinking from doing."<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 34.</ref>

			For Durkheim, religion was synonymous with a church.<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. </ref>

			Defined a Church as "“A society whose members are united because they imagine the sacred world and its relations with the profane world in the same way, and because they translate this common representation into identical practices”"<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 41.</ref>

			Also "a moral community made up of all the faithful, both laity and priests." <ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 42.</ref>

			'''Definition''': "A religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbid- den-beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them." <ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 44.</ref>
	{{endstuff}}		{{endstuff}}

	[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]][[category:todo]]		[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]][[category:todo]]

Michael: added some information on Durkheim's view of religion

2021-07-09T00:50:36Z

added some information on Durkheim's view of religion

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 9 July 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. p. 71. </ref>		Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. p. 71. </ref>

	"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements. ~~(ibid~~.:9)"		Did not attack religion and believed it played an essential role as projection of society.

			"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements."<ref>Durkheim, Emile. ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life''. New York: Free Press, 1995. p. 9.</ref>
	{{endstuff}}		{{endstuff}}

	[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]][[category:todo]]		[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion\| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion\| ]][[category:todo]]

Michael: Created page with "{{template:draft}} {{navmenu}}

Who was he? What did he write about.

==Notes== Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."..."

2021-07-09T00:35:58Z

Created page with "{{template:draft}} {{navmenu}} <h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1> <blockquote class="definition">Who was he? What did he write about. </blockquote> ==Notes== Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."..."

New page

{{template:draft}}
{{navmenu}}
<h1 class="customtitle">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</h1>
<blockquote class="definition">Who was he? What did he write about.
</blockquote>

==Notes==

Was interested in finding the "essence of religiosity itself."<ref>Cipriani, Roberta. Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. London: Transaction Publishers, 2000. p. 71. </ref>

"Religion is an eminently social thing. Religious representations are collective representations that express collective realities; rites are ways of acting that are born only in the midst of assembled groups and whose purpose is to evoke, maintain, or recreate certain mental states of those groups. But if the categories are of religious origin,Sociology of Religion then they must participate in what is common to all religion: They, too, must be social things, products of collective thought. At the very least—since with our present understanding of these matters, radical and exclusive theses are to be guarded against—it is legitimate to say that they are rich in social elements. (ibid.:9)"
{{endstuff}}

[[category:terms]][[category:lightningpath]][[Had a functional definition of::Religion| ]][[Had a substantive definition of::Religion| ]][[category:todo]]